首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

食管癌淋巴结转移特点及其危险因素
引用本文:LI B,XIANG JQ,ZHANG YW,HU H,MA LF,MIAO LS,LI HC,CHEN HQ. 食管癌淋巴结转移特点及其危险因素[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2011, 14(9): 711-714. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2011.09.019
作者姓名:LI B  XIANG JQ  ZHANG YW  HU H  MA LF  MIAO LS  LI HC  CHEN HQ
作者单位:复旦大学附属肿瘤医院胸外科 复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系, 上海,200032
摘    要:目的 探讨食管癌淋巴结转移情况及其危险因素,为外科手术行淋巴结清扫提供参考。方法回顾总结2006年1月至2010年12月在复旦大学附属肿瘤医院胸外科行三野淋巴结清扫食管癌根治术308例患者的临床资料.分析淋巴结的转移规律及特点。结果308例患者平均清扫淋巴结(35.6±14.5)枚,197例(64%)患者出现淋巴结转移。Logistic单因素分析结果显示,脉管(淋巴管及血管)侵犯(P=0.019)及肿瘤浸润深度(P〈0.001)是发生淋巴结转移的危险因素。各站淋巴结中,胸部气管旁淋巴结转移率最高(25.0%)。上段食管癌腹部淋巴结转移率显著低于中段或下段食管癌(P=0.001),而各段食管癌颈胸部淋巴结转移率比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。颈胸部和颈胸腹部淋巴结转移率分别为14.6%和11.0%,而颈腹部和胸腹部则分别为3.6%和4.9%。脉管侵犯(P〈0.001)和胸部气管旁淋巴结转移(P=0.014)是食管癌发生颈部淋巴结转移的危险因素。结论食管癌淋巴结转移具有上、下双向和跳跃性的特点.胸部气管旁淋巴结转移可作为行颈部淋巴结清扫的指征。

关 键 词:食管肿瘤  淋巴结转移  胸部气管旁淋巴结

Characteristics and risk factors of lymph node metastases in esophageal carcinoma
LI Bin,XIANG Jia-qing,ZHANG Ya-wei,HU Hong,MA Long-fei,MIAO Long-sheng,LI He-cheng,CHEN Hai-quan. Characteristics and risk factors of lymph node metastases in esophageal carcinoma[J]. Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2011, 14(9): 711-714. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2011.09.019
Authors:LI Bin  XIANG Jia-qing  ZHANG Ya-wei  HU Hong  MA Long-fei  MIAO Long-sheng  LI He-cheng  CHEN Hai-quan
Affiliation:Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Fudan University Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Abstract:Objective To investigate the status of lymph node metastases (LNM) of esophageal carcinoma and to identify the risk factors. Methods Clinical data of 308 patients who underwent esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy during January 2006 and December 2010 were reviewed. Characteristics of LNM were studied. Results The average number of dissected lymph nodes was 35.6±14.5 in 308 patients. There were 197 patients (64%) had LNM. Logistic regression analysis showed that lymphatic vessel invasion(P=0.019) and deep tumor invasion(P<0.001 ) were risk factors of LNM. The highest LNM site was paratracheal node (25.0%). The incidence of cervical LNM was 14.1% in the middle thoracic carcinoma, higher than that of upper thoracic (7.3%) and lower thoracic (8.3%). Rate of LNM was lower in upper thoracic carcinomas than that in middle or lower ones (P=0.001). No significant difference of LNM was found among upper, middle and lower thoracic carcinoma for cervical or thoracic nodes. Lymphatic vessel invasion (P<0.001)and metastases in paratracheal lymph nodes (P=0.014) were risk factors for cervical LNM. Conclusions LNM of esophageal carcinoma can be found in both directions vertically and skipped metastasis. Paratracheal lymph nodes involvement is an indicator for cervical lymphadenectomy in thoracic esophageal carcinoma.
Keywords:Esophageal neoplasms  Lymph node metastases  Paratracheal lymph nodes
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号