首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

重组质粒导入真核细胞的两种方法比较
引用本文:陈枫,张建军,钟森. 重组质粒导入真核细胞的两种方法比较[J]. 泸州医学院学报, 2001, 24(4): 280-282
作者姓名:陈枫  张建军  钟森
作者单位:泸州医学院附属医院传染与免疫研究室,泸州,646000
摘    要:目的:比较糖化多聚赖氨酸介导和电穿孔两种方法将重组质粒导入真核细胞的优缺点。方法:用最佳电压、电容、温度、DNA浓度进行电穿孔转染,或者先使重组质粒与糖化多聚赖氨酸电性结合后,再与2.2.15细胞共同温育的方法,分别将pcEP4-aC重组质粒导入2.2.15细胞,经潮霉素筛选,比较两种方法的优劣。结果:两种方法都能成功地将重组质粒导入2.2.15细胞,但糖化多聚赖氨酸介导者,细胞生存时间较长。结论:糖化多聚赖氨酸导向配体具有良好的导入重组质粒进入肝细胞的功能,且更适合于应用。

关 键 词:外源基因 电转染 糖化多聚赖氨酸 导向 重组质粒
文章编号:1000-2669(2001)04-0280-03

COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF DELIVERING GENES INTO EUKARYOTIC CELLS
Chen Feng,et al Lab of Infection , Immunology,Luzhou Medical College Hospital. COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF DELIVERING GENES INTO EUKARYOTIC CELLS[J]. Journal of Luzhou Medical College, 2001, 24(4): 280-282
Authors:Chen Feng  et al Lab of Infection & Immunology  Luzhou Medical College Hospital
Abstract:Objective: To compare the advantage or defect between glactosylated poly-L-lysine(Gal-PLL) targeting and electroporation for delivering gene into eukaryotic cells. Method: Take an optimal electroporation program or Gal-PLL targeting to deliver recombinant plasmid pcEP4-aC into 2.2.15 cells, respectively, and then to compare the advantage or defect between them. Result: Both methods could deliver pcEP4-aC into 2.2.15 cells effectively. However, after acceptance of pcEP4-aC, the 2.2.15 cells would survive longer when by Gal-PLL targeting. Conclusion: Gal-PLL targeting ligand is not only able to deliver gene into hepatocytes effectively, but is also more suitable for applying to in vivo use.
Keywords:Recombinant plasmid  Electroporation  Glactosylated poly-L-lysine(Gal-PLL)  Targeting
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号