《本草纲目拾遗》石打穿与石见穿的品种考证

目的：从本草文献中探讨民间草药石打穿与石见穿的历史渊源。方法：通过文献查考,结合实际疗效调查进行分析。结果：《本草纲目》对石打穿无载,只将石见穿列入“有名未用”,且无产地记载与形态描述。结论：《本草纲目拾遗》始载的石打穿,为蔷薇科植物龙芽草（仙鹤草） ;石见穿应为菊科植物鬼针草,而不是唇形科植物华鼠尾草。《中国药典》１９７７ 年版一部的石见穿才是华鼠尾草,华鼠尾草是近现代石见穿的新兴品种。

Textural research on "Shidachuan" and "Shijianchuan" in "Ben Cao Gang Mu Shi Yi" (a supplement to the compendium of materia medica)]

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the historical origins of folk herbal medicines "Shidachuan" and "Shijianchuan" METHOD: The origins of "Shidachuan" and "Shijianchuan" were confirmed by textural research and investigation of therapeutic effects. RESULTS: In "Ben Cao Gang Mu" (the Compendium of Materia Medica) "Shidachuan" was not recorded, and "Shijianchuan" was listed only as a medicine of "nomination without use", with the habitat and morphology being blank. CONCLUSION: The "Shidachuan" which was originally recorded in "Ben Cao Gang Mu Shi Yi" (A Supplement to the Compendium of Materia Medica) should be "Longyacao" (Agrimonia pilosa) of Rosaceae family. "Shijianchuan" should be "Guizhencao" (Bidens bipinata) of Compositae family instead of "Huashuweicao" (Salvia chinensis) of Labiatae family. The herbal medicine recorded as "shijianchuan" in "Chinese Pharmacopoeia" is the very species of Salvia chinensis, which is considered as a new rising species of "Shijianchuan".