两种电疗仪止痛效应的实验对比研究

目的研究两种电疗仪止痛效应及其作用机制。方法分别应用日本好玛公司原装进口低周波治疗器(以下简称好玛组)与台湾产低频调制中频电疗(以下简称Likon组)进行疗前后的皮电、皮温、痛阈及临床疗效的对比研究。结果两组皮电对比差异不显著。两组皮温、痛阈均有非常显著的差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。两组5次及10次疗后对比均有非常显著差异(P<0.001)。结论好玛电疗仪具同步加温功能，其加速局部血液循环的作用更加突出，其止痛效应较其他低、中频电疗更显著，且医治软组织损伤的痊愈率高，疗程短。

Comparing two low frequency electrotherapy's effects on treating aches

Objective To discovering the effective mechanics on lab and clinic between using two low frequency impulse electrotherapy.Methods To comparing the resistance of skin,temperature of skin,pain threshold and curative effect by using low frequency current apparatus(Homers,made in Japan)with low frequency modulated medium frequency impulse electrotherapy,(Likon,made in Taiwan) before and after treatment.Result There aren't diference in the resistance of skin,(P=0.15).The temperature of skin in Homers is higher than in Likon(P< 0.01).The pain threshold in Hosmer is more increased than in Likon(P< 0.05).The Curative effect after ten and five times to treat the soft tissue injure in Homer is better than in libon(P< 0.001).Conclusion The homer apparatus has hot effect,so it can promote the blood circulation.Relieved in pain by Hosmer is better than by Likon.the soft tissue injure is recover quicker by Homer than by Likon.