在加速康复外科理念指导下的腹腔镜胃癌根治术

目的: 重点观察在加速康复外科(FTS)新理念指导下行腹腔镜胃癌根治术的安全性和有效性. 方法: 将90例择期胃癌手术病人分为三组,每组30例.A组采取传统的围手术期处理方法;B组应用FTS理念行剖腹手术;C组应用FTS理念行腹腔镜手术.比较三组病人手术时间、出血量、淋巴结清扫数量、术后开始下床时间、肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、并发症和住院费用等. 结果: C组与A组和B组比,病人术中出血量明显减少(P<0.01),但手术时间明显延长(P<0.01),治疗费用显著增加(P<0.01).三组间淋巴结清扫数量无显著性差异.C组与A组相比,病人术后肠功能恢复时间显著提前(P<0.01),术后住院时间明显缩短(P<0.01).C组与B组病人肠功能恢复时间和术后住院时间无明显差异(P>0.05). 结论: 在FTS理念指导下应用腹腔镜行胃癌手术,可缩短术后住院时间,加快肠功能恢复.但与FTS剖腹手术相比,优势并不十分明显.

Fast-track surgery in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of fast track surgery in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: All patients received elective gastric cancer resection, and were divided into three groups: group Ⅰ (open gastrecomy, n = 30) , group Ⅱ (open gastrecomy with fast track surgery, n = 30) , and group Ⅲ (laparoscopic gastrecomy with fast track surger-y ,n =30) . Clinical data and gut function were assessed in three groups. Results: There were no significant differences in postoperative complication and the number of lymph node harvest between 3 groups. Blood loss was less in group Ⅲ than group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ (P <0.01) ,but its operative time was longer and its cost was more than other two open surgery groups (P < 0. 01). Recovery of bowel function in group Ⅲ was faster,and postoperative hospital stay was shorter than group Ⅰ (P<0.01). However, recovery of bowel function and postoperative hospital stay in group Ⅲ was not different from group Ⅱ (P > 0. 05). Conclusion: Postoperative hospital stay can be shorter and recovery of bowel function can be faster in laparoscopic gastrectomy with fast track surgery plan compared to traditional care group. But when using fast track surgery plan, laparoscopic gastrectomy was not superior to open surgery.