Right internal mammary artery and radial artery composite in situ pedicle graft in coronary artery bypass grafting

Background. The use of two internal mammary artery grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting has been associated with decreased risks of death, reoperation, and angioplasty. However, bilateral internal mammary artery takedown is associated with higher incidence of sternal wound infection, particularly in people with diabetes and in elderly and obese patients. This study was conducted to explore the feasibility of using right internal mammary artery (RIMA) and radial artery (RA) as a composite graft while preserving the distal two thirds of the RIMA to leave the sternal blood supply intact.

Methods. Eighteen patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting using proximal RIMA and RA composite graft as one of the bypass conduits. The distal two thirds of the RIMA was left intact to preserve sternal blood supply. The graft-free flows of the RIMA and RA composite graft and of the left internal mammary artery graft and the length of the composite graft had been measured. The graft patency and the flow in the distal part of the unharvested RIMA was evaluated postoperatively 2 weeks after the procedure. In 6 of these patients the graft patency was evaluated by selective angiography.

Results. There was no hospital mortality or incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction. None of the patients needed intraaortic balloon pump support postoperatively. There was no sternal wound infection. The vessels grafted were distal right coronary artery (n = 7), posterior descending artery (n = 8), obtuse marginal branches (n = 3), and posterolateral ventricular branch (n = 1); 1 patient received the composite graft as a sequential graft to the posterior descending artery and posterolateral left ventricular branches. The mean graft-free flow of the RIMA and RA composite graft was 98.06 ± 16.93 mL/min compared to left internal mammary artery flows of 55.80 ± 8.99 mL/min. All 16 patients who had a good echo window showed patent grafts when evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiography and color Doppler echocardiography. All of the 6 patients in whom the angiogram was repeated postoperatively showed patent RIMA and RA grafts.

Conclusions. Myocardial revascularization using proximal RIMA and RA in situ pedicle graft was safe in patients with diabetes and in obese and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. This graft was useful to revascularize posterior descending artery, posterolateral ventricular branches of right coronary artery, and obtuse marginal branches where a left internal mammary artery and RA composite graft cannot be used because of technical reasons. Its usage was not associated with sternal wound infection.