| Abstract: | The nucleus accumbens (NAc) serves as a key neural substrate for aversive learning and consists of two distinct subpopulations of medium-sized spiny neurons (MSNs). The MSNs of the direct pathway (dMSNs) and the indirect pathway (iMSNs) predominantly express dopamine (DA) D1 and D2 receptors, respectively, and are positively and negatively modulated by DA transmitters via Gs- and Gi-coupled cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) signaling cascades, respectively. In this investigation, we addressed how intracellular PKA signaling is involved in aversive learning in a cell type-specific manner. When the transmission of either dMSNs or iMSNs was unilaterally blocked by pathway-specific expression of transmission-blocking tetanus toxin, infusion of PKA inhibitors into the intact side of the NAc core abolished passive avoidance learning toward an electric shock in the indirect pathway-blocked mice, but not in the direct pathway-blocked mice. We then examined temporal changes in PKA activity in dMSNs and iMSNs in behaving mice by monitoring Förster resonance energy transfer responses of the PKA biosensor with the aid of microendoscopy. PKA activity was increased in iMSNs and decreased in dMSNs in both aversive memory formation and retrieval. Importantly, the increased PKA activity in iMSNs disappeared when aversive memory was prevented by keeping mice in the conditioning apparatus. Furthermore, the increase in PKA activity in iMSNs by aversive stimuli reflected facilitation of aversive memory retention. These results indicate that PKA signaling in iMSNs plays a critical role in both aversive memory formation and retention.Aversive stimuli induce not only rapid avoidance behavior, but also memory formation to escape from uncomfortable environments, and thus strongly influence animal behavior (1–3). The mesolimbic dopaminergic (DA) system plays a critical role in both rapid aversive reaction and memory formation (3–5). The nucleus accumbens (NAc) receives DA inputs from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and serves as a key neural substrate for the control of aversive learning (6–8). The NAc consists of two subpopulations of medium-sized spiny neurons (MSNs) (9–11). The MSNs of the direct pathway (dMSNs) send their axons to the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) and VTA, and selectively express dopamine D1 receptors, whereas the MSNs of the indirect pathway (iMSNs) indirectly project to the SNr and VTA via the ventral pallidum (VP) and predominantly express D2 receptors (12, 13). D1 receptors stimulate the cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) signaling cascade via Gs and exhibit a low affinity for DA (14–16). Conversely, D2 receptors inhibit the cAMP-PKA cascade via Gi and show a high affinity for DA (14–16). Thus, these two distinct types of MSNs, constituting two parallel pathways, contribute to the dynamic modulation of neuronal cell excitability and synaptic plasticity in the NAc circuitry (14–16).Although accumulated evidence indicates that DA modulation of the NAc is critical for both reward-based and aversive reactions (3, 5, 6, 17), the response of DA neurons in the VTA to aversive stimuli is not uniform; that is, some DA neurons are stimulated in response to aversive stimuli, whereas most others react by transiently suppressing their firing (18–22). Recent optogenetic studies have revealed that not only activation of iMSNs, but also inactivation of the VTA neurons, which down-regulates DA levels in the NAc, evoke an aversive reaction and learning (23–26); however, how intracellular cAMP-PKA signaling is involved in the induction and retention of aversive memory in a cell type-dependent manner in the NAc circuit remains largely elusive.In the present investigation, we addressed this issue using two approaches. We first used asymmetric reversible neurotransmission blocking (aRNB) techniques (27, 28), in which either the direct or indirect pathway at one side of the NAc was selectively blocked by the pathway-specific expression of transmission-blocking tetanus toxin and the other intact side was manipulated by injection of PKA inhibitors. In the second approach, we examined temporal changes in PKA activities of these two pathways in the formation of aversive memory by monitoring Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) responses of PKA selective for either dMSNs or iMSNs with the aid of in vivo microendoscopic analysis (29, 30). These two different approaches explicitly demonstrated that the activation of PKA in iMSNs plays a key role in both the formation and the retention of aversive memory. |
