Nature of dynamic gradients,glass formation,and collective effects in ultrathin freestanding films |
| |
Authors: | Asieh Ghanekarade Anh D. Phan Kenneth S. Schweizer David S. Simmons |
| |
Affiliation: | aDepartment of Chemical, Biological and Materials Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33620;bFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Phenikaa University, Hanoi 12116, Vietnam;cDepartment of Materials Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801;dDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801;eDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801 |
| |
Abstract: | Molecular, polymeric, colloidal, and other classes of liquids can exhibit very large, spatially heterogeneous alterations of their dynamics and glass transition temperature when confined to nanoscale domains. Considerable progress has been made in understanding the related problem of near-interface relaxation and diffusion in thick films. However, the origin of “nanoconfinement effects” on the glassy dynamics of thin films, where gradients from different interfaces interact and genuine collective finite size effects may emerge, remains a longstanding open question. Here, we combine molecular dynamics simulations, probing 5 decades of relaxation, and the Elastically Cooperative Nonlinear Langevin Equation (ECNLE) theory, addressing 14 decades in timescale, to establish a microscopic and mechanistic understanding of the key features of altered dynamics in freestanding films spanning the full range from ultrathin to thick films. Simulations and theory are in qualitative and near-quantitative agreement without use of any adjustable parameters. For films of intermediate thickness, the dynamical behavior is well predicted to leading order using a simple linear superposition of thick-film exponential barrier gradients, including a remarkable suppression and flattening of various dynamical gradients in thin films. However, in sufficiently thin films the superposition approximation breaks down due to the emergence of genuine finite size confinement effects. ECNLE theory extended to treat thin films captures the phenomenology found in simulation, without invocation of any critical-like phenomena, on the basis of interface-nucleated gradients of local caging constraints, combined with interfacial and finite size-induced alterations of the collective elastic component of the structural relaxation process.Spatially heterogeneous dynamics in glass-forming liquids confined to nanoscale domains (1–7) play a major role in determining the properties of molecular, polymeric, colloidal, and other glass-forming materials (8), including thin films of polymers (9, 10) and small molecules (11–15), small-molecule liquids in porous media (2, 4, 16, 17), semicrystalline polymers (18, 19), polymer nanocomposites (20–22), ionomers (23–25), self-assembled block and layered (26–33) copolymers, and vapor-deposited ultrastable molecular glasses (34–36). Intense interest in this problem over the last 30 y has also been motivated by the expectation that its understanding could reveal key insights concerning the mechanism of the bulk glass transition.Considerable progress has been made for near-interface altered dynamics in thick films, as recently critically reviewed (1). Large amplitude gradients of the structural relaxation time, τ(z,T), converge to the bulk value, τbulk(T), in an intriguing double-exponential manner with distance, z, from a solid or vapor interface (13, 37–42). This implies that the corresponding effective activation barrier, Ftotal(z,T,H) (where H is film thickness), varies exponentially with z, as does the glass transition temperature, Tg (37). Thus the fractional reduction in activation barrier, ε(z,H), obeys the equation , where Ftotal,bulk(T) is the bulk temperature-dependent barrier and ξF a length scale of modest magnitude. Although the gradient of reduction in absolute activation barriers becomes stronger with cooling, the amplitude of the fractional reduction of the barrier gradient, quantified by ε0, and the range ξF of this gradient, exhibit a weak or absent temperature dependence at the lowest temperatures accessed by simulations (typically with the strength of temperature dependence of ξF decreasing rather than increasing on cooling), which extend to relaxation timescales of order 105 ps. This finding raises questions regarding the relevance of critical-phenomena–like ideas for nanoconfinement effects (1). Partially due to this temperature invariance, coarse-grained and all-atom simulations (1, 37, 42, 43) have found a striking empirical fractional power law decoupling relation between τ(z,T) and τbulk(T):[1]Recent theoretical analysis suggests (44) that this behavior is consistent with a number of experimental data sets as well (45, 46). Eq. 1 also corresponds to a remarkable factorization of the temperature and spatial location dependences of the barrier:[2]This finding indicates that the activation barrier for near-interface relaxation can be factored into two contributions: a z-dependent, but T-independent, “decoupling exponent,” ε(z), and a temperature-dependent, but position-insensitive, bulk activation barrier, Ftotal,bulk(T). Eq. 2 further emphasizes that ε(z) is equivalent to an effective fractional barrier reduction factor (for a vapor interface), , that can be extracted from relaxation data.In contrast, the origin of “nanoconfinement effects” in thin films, and how much of the rich thick-film physics survives when dynamic gradients from two interfaces overlap, is not well understood. The distinct theoretical efforts for aspects of the thick-film phenomenology (44, 47–50) mostly assume an additive summation of one-interface effects in thin films, thereby ignoring possibly crucial cooperative and whole film finite size confinement effects. If the latter involve phase-transition–like physics as per recent speculations (14, 51), one can ask the following: do new length scales emerge that might be truncated by finite film size? Alternatively, does ultrathin film phenomenology arise from a combination of two-interface superposition of the thick-film gradient physics and noncritical cooperative effects, perhaps in a property-, temperature-, and/or thickness-dependent manner?Here, we answer these questions and establish a mechanistic understanding of thin-film dynamics for the simplest and most universal case: a symmetric freestanding film with two vapor interfaces. We focus on small molecules (modeled theoretically as spheres) and low to medium molecular weight unentangled polymers, which empirically exhibit quite similar alterations in dynamics under “nanoconfinement.” We do not address anomalous phenomena [e.g., much longer gradient ranges (29), sporadic observation of two distinct glass transition temperatures (52, 53)] that are sometimes reported in experiments with very high molecular weight polymers and which may be associated with poorly understood chain connectivity effects that are distinct from general glass formation physics (54–56).We employ a combination of molecular dynamics simulations with a zero-parameter extension to thin films of the Elastically Cooperative Nonlinear Langevin Equation (ECNLE) theory (57, 58). This theory has previously been shown to predict well both bulk activated relaxation over up to 14 decades (44–46) and the full single-gradient phenomenology in thick films (1). Here, we extend this theory to treat films of finite thickness, accounting for coupled interface and geometric confinement effects. We compare predictions of ECNLE theory to our previously reported (37, 43) and new simulations, which focus on translational dynamics of films comprised of a standard Kremer–Grest-like bead-spring polymer model (see SI Appendix). These simulations cover a wide range of film thicknesses (H, from 4 to over 90 segment diameters σ) and extend to low temperatures where the bulk alpha time is ∼0.1 μs (105 Lennard Jones time units τLJ).The generalized ECNLE theory is found to be in agreement with simulation for all levels of nanoconfinement. We emphasize that this theory does not a priori assume any of the empirically established behaviors discovered using simulation (e.g., fractional power law decoupling, double-exponential barrier gradient, gradient flattening) but rather predicts these phenomena based upon interfacial modifications of the two coupled contributions to the underlying activation barrier– local caging constraints and a long-ranged collective elastic field. It is notable that this strong agreement is found despite the fact the dynamical ideas are approximate, and a simple hard sphere fluid model is employed in contrast to the bead-spring polymers employed in simulation. The basic unit of length in simulation (bead size σ) and theory (hard sphere diameter d) are expected to be proportional to within a prefactor of order unity, which we neglect in making comparisons.As an empirical matter, we find from simulation that many features of thin-film behavior can be described to leading order by a linear superposition of the thick-film gradients in activation barrier, that is:[3]where the intrinsic decay length ξF is unaltered from its thick-film value and where ε0 is a constant that, in the hypothesis of literal gradient additivity, is invariant to temperature and film thickness. We employ this functional form [originally suggested by Binder and coworkers (59)], which is based on a simple superposition of the two single-interface gradients, as a null hypothesis throughout this study: this form is what one expects if no new finite-size physics enters the thin-film problem relative to the thick film.However, we find that the superposition approximation progressively breaks down, and eventually entirely fails, in ultrathin films as a consequence of the emergence of a finite size confinement effect. The ECNLE theory predicts that this failure is not tied to a phase-transition–like mechanism but rather is a consequence of two key coupled physical effects: 1) transfer of surface-induced reduction of local caging constraints into the film, and 2) interfacial truncation and nonadditive modifications of the collective elastic contribution to the activation barrier. |
| |
Keywords: | glass transition thin film interfacial dynamics elastic activation nanoconfinement |
|
|