Topographic changes in the left ventricle after experimentally induced myocardial infarction in the rat

The factors that determine the thickness of transmural myocardial infarcts are unknown. Therefore, the relation between the size and thickness of transmural infarcts in 67 rats 21 days after occlusion of the left main coronary artery was studied. On examination of histologic sections, infarct size was determined by planimetry and expressed as a percentage of the left ventricular (LV) area, and thickness was expressed as a percentage of noninfarcted ventricular septal wall thickness. The circumferential length of the infarcted ventricle was measured in millimeters, as well as the circumferential length of the noninfarcted ventricular septum. Septal wall thickness was similar in rats with transmural infarcts and in sham-operated rats. No significant correlation was observed between infarct size and thickness (r = 0.10) or between circumferential length of the infarct and infarct thickness (r = 0.17). However, large (greater than or equal to 20% of the left ventricle, n = 37) and small (less than 20% of the left ventricle, n = 30) infarcts which were similarly thin (37 +/- 1% and 34 +/- 2% of septal wall thickness, respectively) affected LV topography differently. Large infarcts resulted in a 23% greater loss of myocardium (p less than 0.001), greater expansion of the LV cavity (18 +/- 9 mm2 compared with 14 +/- 1 mm2 in small infarcts, p less than 0.005), and lengthening of the septal wall (7.2 +/- 1.1 mm and 6.7 +/- 1.0 mm in large and small infarcts, respectively [p less than 0.05], and 6.3 +/- 0.1 mm in shams). Increase in cavity area and septal length in infarcted ventricles suggested a volume overload hypertrophy, which at 3 weeks was nonetheless inadequate to provide as much normal muscle as was present in sham-operated rats. In an additional 9 rats with subendocardial infarctions (involving less than 75% of the LV wall from endocardium to epicardium), the LV walls were thicker (94 +/- 5% of septal wall thickness, compared with 35 +/- 1% for transmural infarcts, p less than 0.001) and an inverse correlation was observed between infarct size and thickness. In conclusion, neither the size of a transmural infarct in rat nor the circumferential length of infarction determines the thickness of the infarct; however, infarct size does affect LV topography by increasing LV cavity area and the length of the noninfarcted septal wall. Subendocardial infarcts result in less myocardial thinning than do transmural infarcts.