Comparative effectiveness of imaging modalities for preoperative assessment of anorectal malformation in the pediatric population

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of MRI, colostography/fistulography, and X-ray imaging modalities for preoperative diagnosis of anorectal malformations (ARMs) in pediatric patients.MethodsThis retrospective analysis included a total of 84 pediatric patients with ARMs. Preoperative imaging findings were assessed by 2 radiologists and compared to surgical findings.ResultsMRI identified anomalies of the spine in 25 of 84 patients (29.8%), anomalies of the genital system in 7 of 84 patients (8.3%), anomalies of the urinary system in 22 of 84 patients (26.2%), and underdeveloped sphincter muscle complex in 34 of 84 patients (40.5%). In the 44 subjects receiving both MRI and X-ray, MRI was more sensitive in detecting anomalies of spine (18/44 vs. 8/44; P = 0.002), and both correctly identified the distal end of the rectum in 77.3% (34/44) of the cases. In the 24 subjects receiving both MRI and colostography/fistulography, MRI was more accurate in identifying Pena's classification (22/24 vs. 15/24; P = 0.039). Distal end of the rectum was correctly identified in 75.0% (18/24) and 58.3% (14/24) of the cases (P = 0.125).ConclusionsMRI could clearly reveal fistula anatomy and associated anomalies of ARMs and should be routinely used for preoperative evaluation of ARMs.Type of studyStudy of diagnostic test.Level of evidenceLevel II.