Efficacy and Safety of Ultra-Low-Dose Valganciclovir Chemoprophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus Infection in High-Risk Kidney Transplantation Patients |
| |
Authors: | Jin Ho Lee Hee Yeoun Kim Dong Yeol Lee Yoon Ji Kim Hee Ryong Lee Joon Seok Oh Yong Hun Sin Joong Kyung Kim Seun Deuk Hwang |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bong Seng Memorial Hospital, Busan, Korea;2. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Mediplex Sejong Hospital, Incheon, South Korea;3. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maryknoll Medical Center, Busan, Korea;4. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea |
| |
Abstract: | IntroductionValganciclovir (VGCV) prophylaxis of 900 mg twice daily for 6 months is recommended to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, which is a major cause of decreased graft and patient survival in kidney transplant recipients. However, recent studies have shown the efficacy of 900 mg once daily for 3 to 6 months. Maintaining VGCV compliance is difficult because of high drug costs and side effects, such as thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. Therefore, we studied the efficacy of ultra-low dose, short-duration VGCV (450 mg every other day for 3 months) in preventing CMV infection in ABO-incompatible (ABOiKT) and deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all kidney transplant patients > 18 years old treated at Bong Seng Memorial Hospital from June 2009 to July 2016 who received ultra-low-dose VGCV prophylaxis (450 mg every other day for 3 months). The review included 74 CMV seropositive donor/seropositive recipient (D+/R+) ABOiKT and 78 CMV D+/R+DDKT recipients. The primary outcome was occurrence of CMV infection. Secondary outcomes were graft and patient survival and hematologic side effects.ResultsMean prophylaxis and follow-up were 3 and 98 months, respectively. CMV disease occurrence was significantly higher in DDKT than in ABOiKT (12 cases, 8.1%, vs 1 case, .7%, P < .01). There were no significant differences in patient survival rate, graft survival rate, or hematologic side effects between the groups.ConclusionUltra-low-dose VGCV prophylaxis to prevent CMV infection is effective in ABOiKT, but other treatment protocols are needed for DDKT patients. |
| |
Keywords: | Address correspondence to Seun Deuk Hwang, MD, Inha University Hospital, 7-206 3-ga Sinhung-dong, Jung-gu, Inchon 400-711, Korea. Tel: +82-32-890-2229 Fax: +82.32-890-2530. |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|