首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

全麻诱导期芬太尼复合不同静脉麻醉药时适宜用量的探讨
引用本文:郭晓春,胡宁利.全麻诱导期芬太尼复合不同静脉麻醉药时适宜用量的探讨[J].东南国防医药,2008,10(3):195-198.
作者姓名:郭晓春  胡宁利
作者单位:1. 解放军第117医院麻醉科,浙江杭州,310013
2. 解放军第97医院麻醉科,江苏徐州,221004
摘    要:目的探讨全麻诱导期芬太尼复合静脉麻醉药时,既能预防气管插管心血管应激反应,又无过度降压效应的适宜剂量。方法全麻气管插管下择期手术患者162例,按麻醉配方分7组:组1硫喷妥钠5mg/kg,芬太尼7μg/kg(n=25);组2依托咪酯0.3mg/kg,芬太尼7gg/kg(n=28);组3依托咪酯0.3mg/kg,芬太尼5μg/kg(n=27);组4咪唑安定(力月西)0.05mg/kg,依托咪酯0.3mg/kg,芬太尼6μg/kg(n=22);组5异丙酚2mg/kg,芬太尼7μg/kg(n=15);组6异丙酚2mg/kg,芬太尼5μg/kg(n=15);组7异丙酚2mg/kg,芬太尼3gg/kg(n=30)。记录麻醉诱导前、诱导后、插管即刻、插管后1、3、5、7、10min收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)。结果各组进行自身对照,与基础值比较:组1,SBP、DBP和MAP在诱导后、插管后5、7、10min明显降低(P〈0.05),HR在诱导后和插管1min明显增快(P〈0.05)。组2,各项指标在各时点之间无显著差异(P〉0.05)。组3,SBP在插管1min时显著增高(P〈0.01)。组4,仅SBP在诱导后明显降低(P〈0.05)。组5,SBP、DBP、MAP在诱导后和插管后各时点显著降低(P〈0.01)。组6,SBP、DBP、MAP在诱导后和插管后7、10min显著降低(P〈0.01)。组7,SBP、DBP、MAP仅在诱导后显著降低(P〈0.01)。结论静脉麻醉药在推荐的诱导剂量基础上,硫喷妥钠或依托咪酯伍用芬太尼7ug/kg,依托咪酯加咪唑安定伍用芬太尼6ug/kg,异丙酚伍用芬太尼3ug/kg较为适宜。

关 键 词:芬太尼  气管插管  心血管应激反应
文章编号:1672-271X(2008)03-0195-04
修稿时间:2008年3月20日

Optimal dosage of fentanyl combined with intravenous anesthetics during anesthesia induction
GUO Xiao-chun,HU Ning-li.Optimal dosage of fentanyl combined with intravenous anesthetics during anesthesia induction[J].Journal of Southeast China National Defence Medical Science,2008,10(3):195-198.
Authors:GUO Xiao-chun  HU Ning-li
Institution:GUO Xiao-chun ,HU Ning-li (1. Anesthesia Department, the 117th Hospital of PLA, Hangzhou 310013,Zhejiang,China; 2. Anesthesia Department, the 97th Hospital of PLA,Xuzhou 221004, Jiangsu , China )
Abstract:Objective To investigate optimal dosage of fentanyl combined with intravenous anesthetics for the prevention of hemodynamic changes to endotraeheal intubation during anesthesia induction. Methods 162 patients were randomly divided into seven groups: group Ⅰ thiopental 5 mg/kg and fentanyl 7 μg/kg (n=25); group Ⅱ etomidate 0. 8 mg/kg and fentanyl 7μg/kg (n= 28); group Ⅲ etomidate 0. 3 mg/kg and fentanyl 5 μg/kg (n = 27); group Ⅳ midazolam 0. 05 mg/kg, etomidate 0.3 mg/kg and fentanyl 6 μg/kg (n=22); group Ⅴ propofol 2 mg/kg and fentayl 7μg/kg (n=15); group Ⅵ propofol 2 mg/kg and fentanyl 5 μg/kg (n=15); group Ⅶ propofol 2 mg/kg and fentanyl 3 μg/kg (n=30). SBP,DBP ,MAP,HR,RPP were monitored before and after induction, 0, 1,3,5,7,10 min after intubations. Results SBP,DBP,MAP decreased after induction, and 5,7,10 min after intubations. HR increased 1 min after intubation in group Ⅰ (P〈0.05). Hemodynamics was stable during anesthesia induction in group Ⅱ . SBP increased 1 min after intubation in group Ⅲ (P〈0.01). SBP decreased after induction in group Ⅳ (P〈 0. 05). SBP, DBP,MAP decreased significantly during induction and intubations in group Ⅴ (P〈0. 01). SBP,DBP,MAP decreased after intubations and 7,10 rain after intubations in group Ⅵ (P〈0.01). SBP,DBP,MAP decreased only after inductions in group Ⅶ (P〈0.01). Conclusion Fentanyl 7μg/kg combined with thiopental or etomidate, fentanyl 6 μg/kg combined with midazolam and etomidate, fentanyl 3μg/kg combined with propofol are optimum dose of the prevention of homonymic response to end-intubations during anesthesia induction.
Keywords:Fentanyl  Endotracheal intubation  Hernodynamic change
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号