广东省社区吸毒者针具交换项目试点效果评价

目的　探讨社区中开展针具交换预防艾滋病在吸毒人群中传播的可行性。方法　本研究为设立对照组的社区干预试验。干预区采用针具交换措施 (同伴教育员和医务人员在吸毒人群中宣传安全注射观念、提供免费针具、回收用过的注射器 ) ,对照区不采取任何干预措施 ,为期 10个月(2 0 0 2年 9月至 2 0 0 3年 6月 )。干预前后分别采用滚雪球的方式抽取注射吸毒者进行横断面调查以评估干预效果。结果　干预前后分别对干预区 (42 8名 )和对照社区 (42 9名 )静脉吸毒者进行调查。结果显示 ,干预区的艾滋病知识知晓率由 2 9 4 %上升到 5 8 7% ;多因素logistic分析结果表明 ,看过艾滋病宣传折页或宣传画者知晓率高 ;同基线调查相比 ,干预区中最近 30d内共用针具率由基线的4 8 9%下降到 2 0 4 % ,而在对照区中共用针具率同基线相比无明显改善 ;干预后干预区最近 30d共用针具的原因中“夜间买不到针、到朋友家打针人多针少、害怕被抓不敢买针和没钱买针”的现象相对基线情况有明显改善。结论　针具交换项目可以有效降低社区吸毒者共用针具现象。为控制艾滋病在吸毒人群中的传播 ,针具交换措施应尽快在全国范围内推广。

Evaluation of a pilot study on needle and syringe exchange program among injecting drug users in a community in Guangdong, China

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of needle and syringe exchange program among a community of injecting drug users (IDUs) on AIDS prevention. METHODS: A quasi-experiment design was used in a controlled community intervention study. Needle and syringe exchange program was implemented for 10 months in IDUs of an intervention community, including peer education and health education, provision of free needles and syringes, and collecting back of used needles and syringes by trained peer educators and local health workers, whereas no intervention measure in a control community was instituted. Interviews with IDUs were conducted before and after intervention with a snowballing strategy to evaluate its effectiveness. RESULTS: A total of 428 and 429 IDUs were interviewed with structured questionnaire before and after intervention in intervention and control communities, respectively. Results revealed that awareness of HIV-related knowledge increased from 29.4% to 58.7% in the intervention community. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that awareness of HIV-related knowledge was higher in those who had read health education materials (OR = 2.93, 95% CI 2.12 - 4.04). As compared with the baseline data, frequency of sharing needles and syringes in past 30 days in the intervention community decreased from 48.9% to 20.4% in before intervention community (chi(2) = 41.02, P = 0.001), whereas there was no significant change in the control community. The causes of sharing needles and syringes in the intervention community included 'disable to get needle and syringe during the night', 'lack of needle and syringe when injecting at friend's home', 'not daring to buy needle and syringe for fear of being arrested' and 'no money to buy needle and syringe', declined markedly. CONCLUSIONS: Needle and syringe exchange program was feasible and effective in reducing their risky drug injecting behavior among IDUs in communities. Such strategy should be adopted in the country to reduce rapid spread of HIV.