首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

人体组织“财产”论批判性思考
引用本文:赵西巨. 人体组织“财产”论批判性思考[J]. 医学与社会, 2008, 21(1): 27-29. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1006-5563.2008.01.012
作者姓名:赵西巨
作者单位:山东中医药大学人文社科学院,山东济南,250355
摘    要:我国民法界一般认为,与人体分离的组织和器官为“物”,可以享有物权保护方式。这一观点在语言表达语境上存在缺憾。英美司法不太情愿将人体组织放在“财产”概念下去考察,这与人体组织的非财产化这一普通法原则是吻合的。人体组织财产化存在诸多负面影响。它的功能可以用知情同意和人格权保护达到。

关 键 词:人体组织  财产  知情同意
收稿时间:2007-10-15
修稿时间:2007-10-15

Critical Reflection on the Property Argument of Tissues from Human Body
Zhao Xiju. Critical Reflection on the Property Argument of Tissues from Human Body[J]. Medicine and Society, 2008, 21(1): 27-29. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1006-5563.2008.01.012
Authors:Zhao Xiju
Affiliation:Zhao Xiju (Shandong University of TCM, Jinan, Shandong 250355)
Abstract:In the field of civil law in our country,tissues and organs,once separated from human body,are generally deemed as a kind of property and they can enjoy the special protection available to property.However,the property argument is unsatisfactory because of language expression.In USA and UK,courts are reluctant to see human tissue under the concept of "property".This reflects the common law rule that there is no property on human tissues.The property argument of human tissues has many negative implications and its functions can be achieved by informed consent and personality protection.
Keywords:tissues from human body  property  informed consent
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号