首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

纳洛酮与醒脑静治疗急性酒精中毒的最小成本分析
引用本文:胡宝荣,张新建,高丽萍. 纳洛酮与醒脑静治疗急性酒精中毒的最小成本分析[J]. 中国药房, 2006, 17(21): 1626-1627
作者姓名:胡宝荣  张新建  高丽萍
作者单位:哈尔滨医科大学第一临床医学院,哈尔滨市,150001
摘    要:目的:评价纳洛酮与醒脑静治疗急性酒精中毒的疗效和经济性。方法:94例急性酒精中毒患者分别应用纳洛酮与醒脑静治疗后观察疗效,并进行最小成本分析。结果:2种药物有效率分别为95.5%和91.8%,无显著性差异(P>0.05);治疗药品成本分别为(118.26±31.59)和(345.60±96.00)元,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:纳洛酮治疗急性酒精中毒的经济学效果优于醒脑静。

关 键 词:纳洛酮  醒脑静  急性酒精中毒  最小成本分析
文章编号:1001-0408(2006)21-1626-02
收稿时间:2006-01-12
修稿时间:2006-05-09

Cost- minimization Analyses of Naloxone and Xingnaojing in the Treatment of Acute Alcohol Intoxication
HU Baorong,ZHANG Xinjian,GAO Liping. Cost- minimization Analyses of Naloxone and Xingnaojing in the Treatment of Acute Alcohol Intoxication[J]. China Pharmacy, 2006, 17(21): 1626-1627
Authors:HU Baorong  ZHANG Xinjian  GAO Liping
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To compare the curative effects and pharmacoeconomics of naloxone and xingnaojing in the treatment of acute alcohol intoxication.METHODS: A total of 94 patients with acute alcohol intoxication were randomly assigned to receive naloxone or xingnaojing,the curative effects of 2 groups were monitored and the cost minimization analysis was carried out using pharmacoeconomics.RESULTS: The effective rates of the 2 drugs were 95.5% and 91.8% respectively,and there was no significant difference between 2 groups(P>0.05).The costs of 2 drugs were(118.26± 31.59) yuan and(345.60± 96.00) yuan respectively,and there were significant differences between 2 groups(P<0.05).CONCLUSION: Nalox_one is superior to xingnaojing in pharmacoeconomics in the treatment of acute alcohol intoxication.
Keywords:Naloxone    Xingnaojing    Acute alcohol intoxication    Cost - minimization analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号