首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

乳腺浸润性导管癌的3.0TMRI诊断
引用本文:韦苇,黄仲奎,龙莉玲,裴云,蒋牧良.乳腺浸润性导管癌的3.0TMRI诊断[J].磁共振成像,2012,3(6):434-439.
作者姓名:韦苇  黄仲奎  龙莉玲  裴云  蒋牧良
作者单位:韦苇 (广西医科大学第一附属医院放射科,南宁,530021) ; 黄仲奎 (广西医科大学第一附属医院放射科,南宁,530021) ; 龙莉玲 (广西医科大学第一附属医院放射科,南宁,530021) ; 裴云 (广西医科大学第一附属医院放射科,南宁,530021) ; 蒋牧良 (广西医科大学第一附属医院放射科,南宁,530021) ;
摘    要:目的探讨乳腺浸润性导管癌的3.0T MR影像学特点,提高对浸润性导管癌术前诊断的准确性。材料与方法回顾性分析65例(69病灶)经手术或穿刺病理证实的浸润性导管癌患者的MRI资料,均采用3.0T MRI行平扫、动态增强及DWI序列扫描,分析病灶的MRI影像学特征,包括形态学表现、血流动力学特征、时间-信号曲线(TIC)及ADC值。采用配对设计t检验比较浸润性导管癌病灶和正常乳腺组织ADC值的差异,同时采用成组设计方差分析比较3型曲线间ADC值有无差异。结果 65例(69例病灶)浸润性导管癌表现为肿块型58.0%(40/69)]或非肿块型42.0%(29/69)],边缘不规则,T1WI呈等36.2%(25/69)]或低信号63.8%(44/69)],T2WI呈稍高27.5%(19/69)]或高信号72.5%(50/69)],DWI呈稍高49.3%(34/69)]或高信号50.7%(35/69)],增强扫描肿块型呈早期不均匀强化,内部间隔强化,非肿块型以导管样及簇集状强化为主,TIC以Ⅱ型56.5%(39/69)]、Ⅲ型37.7%(26/69)]曲线为主,ADC平均值(0.93±0.21)×10^-3mm^2/s,尚不能认为3型曲线间ADC值差异有统计学意义(F=0.182,P=0.834〉0.05)。结论应用3.0T MRI动态增强扫描及DWI序列,能较好的显示病变形态及强化方式,结合形态学表现、血流动力学及功能学特征,有助于对浸润性导管癌的术前诊断。

关 键 词:  导管  乳腺  磁共振成像  弥散

Diagnosis in 3.0 T MRI of infiltrating ductal carcinoma of breast
WEI Wei,HUANG Zhong-kui,LONG Li-ling,PEI Yun,JIANG Mu-liang.Diagnosis in 3.0 T MRI of infiltrating ductal carcinoma of breast[J].Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging,2012,3(6):434-439.
Authors:WEI Wei  HUANG Zhong-kui  LONG Li-ling  PEI Yun  JIANG Mu-liang
Institution:Department of Radiology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University,Nanning 530021,China
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the imaging appearance of infiltrating ductal carcinoma at 3.0 T MRI and improve the diagnosis accuracy of infiltrating ductal carcinoma.Materials and Methods:Imaging data of 65 patients(69 lesions) with infiltrating ductal carcinoma proved by operation or biopsy were retrospectively analyzed.All underwent plain,dynamic contrast-enhanced and DWI scan using 3.0 T MRI.The MRI features analyzed included morphological characteristics,hemodynamic performance,the time-signal intensity curve(TIC) and mean ADC.The ADC values for infiltrating ductal carcinoma and normal breast tissue were compared using paired t test and using the grouping design analysis of variance comparison between three type curve difference between ADC values.Results:Sixty-five cases(69 cases of focal) infiltrating ductal carcinoma were performanced with the mass 58.0%(40/69)] or non-mass-like 42.0%(29/69)],margin irregular,equal 36.2%(25/69)] or low signal intensity 63.8%(44/69)] on T1WI,slightly high 27.5%(19/69)] or high signal intensity 72.5%(50/69)] on T2WI,the DWI is slightly high 49.3%(34/69)] or high signal 50.7%(35/69)],the enhanced scanning mass type was early heterogeneous enhancement,internal septal enhancement,non-mass-like give priority to catheter-like and clustered like,time-signal intensity curve to Ⅱ curve 56.5%(39/69)],Ⅲ curve 37.7%(26/69)] is given priority to.With b=1000 mm^2/s,the mean ADC values for infiltrating ductal carcinoma (0.93±0.21)×10^-3 mm2/s],still can't think three type curve difference between ADC values with a statistical significance(F=0.182,P=0.8340.05).Conclusion:Application the 3.0 T MRI dynamic contrast-enhanced and DWI scan,can better show lesions form and the strengthen way,combined with morphology characteristics,hemodynamic performance and function characteristics,help to infiltrating ductal carcinoma of preoperative diagnosis.
Keywords:Carcinoma  ductal  breast  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号