Selection of Deep Brain Stimulation Candidates in Private Neurology Practices: Referral May Be Simpler than a Computerized Triage System

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare a computerized deep brain stimulation (DBS) screening module (Comparing Private Practice vs. Academic Centers in Selection of DBS Candidates COMPRESS], NeuroTrax Corp., Bellaire, TX, USA) with traditional triage by a movement disorders specialized neurologist as the gold standard. Methods: The COMPRESS consists of a combination of the Florida Surgical Questionnaire for Parkinson disease (FLASQ‐PD), a cognitive assessment battery provided by MindStreams® (NeuroTrax Corp.), and the Geriatric Depression Scale and the Zung Anxiety Self‐Assessment Scale. COMPRESS resulted in the classification of patients into three categories: “optimal candidate,”“probable candidate,” and “not a good candidate.” Similar categorical ratings made by a referring private practice neurologist and by a trained movement disorders specialist were compared with the ratings generated by COMPRESS. Results: A total of 19 subjects with Parkinson's disease were enrolled from five private neurological practices. The clinical impressions of the private practice neurologist vs. those of the movement disorders specialist were in agreement approximately half the time (10/19 cases). The movement disorders specialist and COMPRESS agreed on 15/19 cases. A further comparison between outcomes from the entire COMPRESS module and the FLASQ‐PD questionnaire by itself resulted in high agreement (18/19 cases in agreement). Conclusions: The COMPRESS agreed with an in‐person evaluation by a movement disorders neurologist approximately 80% of the time. The computerized COMPRESS did not provide any screening advantage over the short FLASQ‐PD paper questionnaire. Larger studies will be needed to assess the utility and cost effectiveness of this computerized triage method for DBS.