首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Mycobacteroides (Mycobacterium) abscessus complex,Mycolicibacterium (Mycobacterium) fortuitum,and Mycobacteroides (Mycobacterium) chelonae
Authors:Akio Aono  Kozo Morimoto  Kinuyo Chikamatsu  Hiroyuki Yamada  Yuriko Igarashi  Yoshiro Murase  Akiko Takaki  Satoshi Mitarai
Institution:1. Department of Mycobacterium Reference and Research, The Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan Anti-tuberculosis Association, Kiyose, Japan;2. Respiratory Disease Center, Fukujuji Hospital, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Tokyo, Japan;3. Basic Mycobacteriosis, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
Abstract:The drug susceptibility of rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) varies among isolates. Treatment strategies similarly differ depending on the isolate, and for some, no clear strategy has been identified. This complicates clinical management of RGM. Following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standard M24-A2, we assessed the susceptibility of 140 RGM isolates to 14 different antimicrobial drugs by measuring their minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs). We also investigated the correlation of clarithromycin (CAM) MICs with the erm(41) and rrl gene mutations in the Mycobacteroides (Mycobacterium) abscessus complex, the rrl mutation in Mycobacteroides (Mycobacterium) chelonae, and the erm(39) mutation in Mycolicibacterium (Mycobacterium) fortuitum to determine the contribution of these mutations to CAM susceptibility. The five species and subspecies examined included 48 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus isolates (34.3%), 35 (25.0%) being M. abscessus subsp. massiliense, and two (1.4%) being M. abscessus subsp. bolletii. The M. abscessus complex accounted for 85 isolates (60.7%) in total, whereas 43 isolates (30.7%) were M. fortuitum, and 12 (8.6%) were M. chelonae. Our results demonstrated species-specific susceptibility to antimicrobials. In most cases, susceptibility to CAM could be predicted based on genetic pattern, but since one isolate did not fit that pattern, MIC values needed to be measured. Some isolates also exhibited rates of resistance to other drugs that differed from those previously reported in other locations, indicating that accurate identification of the bacterial isolate and use of the correct method for determining MIC are both important for the diagnosis of RGM.
Keywords:Rapidly growing mycobacteria  Minimal inhibitory concentrations  Clarithromycin  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing  rapidly growing mycobacteria  RGM  minimal inhibitory concentration  MIC  amikacin  AMK  cefoxitin  CFX  levofloxacin  LVFX  clarithromycin  CAM  doxycycline  DOXY  minocycline  MINO  imipenem  IPM  linezolid  LZD  meropenem  MEPM  moxifloxacin  MFLX  sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim  ST  tobramycin  TOB  clofazimine  CLF  sitafloxacin  STFX
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号