首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

乳腺癌改良根治术后三种放疗技术的剂量学对比研究
引用本文:苗俊杰,徐英杰,翟医蕊,门阔,王淑莲,戴建荣. 乳腺癌改良根治术后三种放疗技术的剂量学对比研究[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2021, 30(9): 924-929. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20200528-00281
作者姓名:苗俊杰  徐英杰  翟医蕊  门阔  王淑莲  戴建荣
作者单位:国家癌症中心/国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院放疗科 100021
基金项目:首都卫生发展科研专项(首发2020-2Z-4027)
摘    要:目的:分析比较容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)与固定野调强放疗(F_IMRT)、电子束联合VMAT (E&VMAT)技术在乳腺癌改良根治术后放疗中的剂量学差异,为临床选择治疗方案提供参考。方法:随机选择乳腺癌改良根治术后放疗的左乳腺癌患者10例,靶区包括患侧胸壁和锁骨上淋巴引流区,处方剂量43.5 Gy (2.9 Gy/次...

关 键 词:剂量学  乳腺肿瘤/容积调强弧形疗法  乳腺肿瘤/调强放射疗法  乳腺肿瘤/电子线照射
收稿时间:2020-05-28

Dosimetric comparison of three techniques in radiotherapy for breast cancer after modified mastectomy
Miao Junjie,Xu Yingjie,Zhai Yirui,Men Kuo,Wang Shulian,Dai Jianrong. Dosimetric comparison of three techniques in radiotherapy for breast cancer after modified mastectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2021, 30(9): 924-929. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20200528-00281
Authors:Miao Junjie  Xu Yingjie  Zhai Yirui  Men Kuo  Wang Shulian  Dai Jianrong
Affiliation:Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
Abstract:Objective To analyze and compare the dosimetric differences based on volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), fixed field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (F_IMRT), and electron irradiation combined with VMAT (E&VMAT) in radiotherapy for breast cancer after modified mastectomy, aiming to provide reference for clinical selection of treatment plan. Methods Ten patients with the left breast cancer who received radiotherapy after modified mastectomy were randomly selected. The target areas included chest wall and supraclavicular region, and the prescribed dose was 43.5Gy in 15 fractions (2.9Gy/F). Based on the Pinnacle3 planning system, the VMAT, F_IMRT and E&VMAT plans (electron beam for chest wall, VMAT for supraclavicular area) were designed for each patient. The conformity and homogeneity of the target areas, the dose of organs at risk and treatment time were compared. Results The VMAT plan could improve the dose distribution of the target areas. The conformity index and homogeneity index of the target dose were significantly better than those of the F_IMRT and E&VMAT plans (all P<0.05). The average dose, V30Gy, V20Gy, V10Gy of the left lung in the VMAT plan were significantly better than those in the F_IMRT and E&VMAT plans (all P<0.05). The V5Gy of the left lung in the VMAT plan was significantly better than that in the F_IMRT plan (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the V5Gy of the left lung between the VMAT and E&VMAT plans (P>0.05). The heart, right breast and right lung of the VMAT plan could meet the clinical dose limit requirements. The treatment time of the VMAT, F_IMRT and E&VMAT plans was (326±27) s,(1 082±169) s, and (562±48) s, respectively. Conclusions Compared with the F_IMRT and E&VMAT plans, the VMAT plan has better quality and shorter treatment time. VMAT plan has higher value in clinical application compared with the F_IMRT and E&VMAT plans.
Keywords:Dosimetry  Breast neoplasm/volumetric-modulated arc therapy  Breast neoplasm/intensity-modulate radiotherapy  Breast neoplasm/electron irradiation  
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号