首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A prospective study of variability in mammographic density during the menstrual cycle
Authors:Monica Morrow  Robert T. Chatterton Jr.  Alfred W. Rademaker  Nanjiang Hou  V. Craig Jordan  R. Edward Hendrick  Seema A. Khan
Affiliation:1. Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
2. Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
6. Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
5. Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
4. Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
Abstract:Mammographic breast density has been proposed as a surrogate endpoint in breast cancer prevention studies, but little is known about its variability over time, particularly in relation to menstrual cycle phase. The purpose of this study was to assess variation in breast density on digital mammograms using quantitative and qualitative density measures. Menstrual cycle phase was determined by salivary estradiol and progesterone assays. 73 healthy subjects with regular menses had 1–3 mammograms with paired saliva collection during a 12-month period. The mean difference in density as a percentage of the mean density was calculated for follicular–luteal (n = 50), luteal–luteal (n = 26) and follicular–follicular (n = 23) pairs in the same woman using the same breast. Two density measures (measurement of dense area and BIRADS) were used. The mean luteal density exceeded the mean follicular density by 7.1–9.2%, but density differences between luteal pairs and follicular pairs did not exceed 5%. The intraclass correlation for measurement of dense area was greater than 85% in all phases of the menstrual cycle, but was below 50% for BIRADS for luteal–follicular and follicular–follicular pairs. Our study provides estimates of the amount of variation in mammographic density during the menstrual cycle, and that inherent in repeated density measurement in premenopausal women, and suggests that menstrual phase of mammographic evaluation should be controlled for in intervention studies where density is being used as a surrogate measure.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号