ELECTIVE INACTIVATION OF TOTAL ARTIFICIAL HEART TECHNOLOGY IN NON-FUTILE SITUATIONS: INPATIENTS,OUTPATIENTS AND RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS |
| |
Authors: | KATRINA A. BRAMSTEDT |
| |
Affiliation: | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation , Cleveland, Ohio, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Total artificial heart technology as a potential clinical therapy raises the issue of elective device inactivation in both futile and non-futile situations. This article explores elective device inactivation in non-futile situations. In reply to such requests for inactivation, the medical team should reflect on the individual's decision-making capacity, the clinical appropriateness of the therapy, and the setting of the request (clinical research vs. clinical practice). A decision-making flowchart is presented as a guide for managing inactivation requests. In the research setting, current U.S. federal regulations are murky as to the matter of study withdrawal made by participants who lack decision-making capacity. This compared with clear legal and ethical approaches in the non-research setting (clinical practice). |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|