首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

如何阅读系统评价
引用本文:陈耀龙,王梦书,张文娟,刘婷兰,王紫薇,赵宇,赫万佳,伍媛媛,张玉婷,李幼平.如何阅读系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2009,9(9):1010-1017.
作者姓名:陈耀龙  王梦书  张文娟  刘婷兰  王紫薇  赵宇  赫万佳  伍媛媛  张玉婷  李幼平
作者单位:1. 四川大学华西医院循证医学与临床流行病学教研室,成都,610041
2. 四川大学华两临床医学院,成都,610041
3. 四川大学外国语学院,成都,610065
摘    要:目的介绍系统评价的阅读方法。方法全面检索当前有关阅读与评价医学文献的论文、专著,总结归纳出指导阅读系统评价的一般原则和方法。结果以下十个要点有助于科学、快速、高效阅读系统评价:①是否有同类评价?②是否属最新更新?③是否整合了之前相关的系统评价?④是否制定和实施了完善的检索策略?⑤是否对原始研究进行了质量评价?⑥是否对原始研究结果进行了适当合并?⑦是否对其自身局限性或不足予以说明?⑧是否提出了下一阶段需要解决的问题?⑨是否充分报告了摘要和全文?⑩是否能够用于解决实际问题?本文还从对系统评价利用的角度,将读者分为四个人群:卫生政策制定者、卫生保健提供者、研究人员、患者及普通用户。结论应重视对系统评价的阅凄,以便更好的指导决策,推动循证实践。

关 键 词:系统评价  文献阅读  循证医学

How to Read a Systematic Review
CHEN Yao-long,WANG Meng-shu,ZHANG Wen-juan,LIU Ting-lan,WANG Zi-wei,ZHAO Yu,HAO Wan-jia,WU Yuan-yuan,ZHANG Yu-ting,LI You-ping.How to Read a Systematic Review[J].Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine,2009,9(9):1010-1017.
Authors:CHEN Yao-long  WANG Meng-shu  ZHANG Wen-juan  LIU Ting-lan  WANG Zi-wei  ZHAO Yu  HAO Wan-jia  WU Yuan-yuan  ZHANG Yu-ting  LI You-ping
Institution:1. Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 3. Department of Foreign Languages, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China)
Abstract:Objective To introduce the method of reading systematic reviews. Methods Papers and books on reading and evaluating medical literature were searched comprehensively, and general principles and approaches of reading systematic reviews were summarized. Results The following 10 points were summarized to help read systematic reviews in a scientific, rapid, and efficient way: ① Was there any overviews of reviews? ②Was there a recent update? ③Were the previous relevant systematic reviews integrated? ④Were sound searching strategies established and implemented? ⑤Was quality evaluation done concerning the original research? ⑥Were the results of the original research conflated properly? ⑦Was there any explanation to the limitations or weaknesses of the systematic review? ⑧Were the problems to be solved in the next stage put forward? ⑨Were the abstracts and full-texts reported sufficiently? ⑩Were the systematic reviews helpful in solving practical problems? Additionally, the readers were divided into the four groups based on their application of the systematic reviews: health policy makers, health care suppliers, researchers as well as patients and common people. Conclusion The reading of the systematic reviews should be stressed in order to better guide decision-making and promote evidence-based practice.
Keywords:Systematic review  Literature reading  Evidence-based medicine
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号