首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

医疗损害赔偿适用法律“二元化”问题对策
引用本文:盛天金,雷勇,杨文宇,陈金水. 医疗损害赔偿适用法律“二元化”问题对策[J]. 解放军医院管理杂志, 2007, 14(6): 451-452
作者姓名:盛天金  雷勇  杨文宇  陈金水
作者单位:南京军区福州总医院医务部,福州,350025
摘    要:在医疗损害赔偿纠纷案件的司法的实践中,有的案件适用《民法通则》,有的案件适用《医疗事故处理条例》,这种适用法律“二元化”现象导致了鉴定“二元化”和赔偿标准的“二元化”。本文通过医疗损害赔偿适用法律“二元化”问题的分析思考和正确理解《医疗事故处理条例》的内容和法律位阶,提出结合《民法通则》和《医疗事故处理条例》制定更高法律位阶的《医疗损害处理法》改进对策。

关 键 词:医疗损害赔偿  适用法律  二元化  对策
文章编号:1008-9985(2007)06-0451-02
修稿时间:2007-01-26

Countermeasures to Binary Law in Compensations for Malpractices
SHENG Tian-jin,LEI Yong,YANG Wen-yu,CHEN Jin-shui. Countermeasures to Binary Law in Compensations for Malpractices[J]. Hospital Administration Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 2007, 14(6): 451-452
Authors:SHENG Tian-jin  LEI Yong  YANG Wen-yu  CHEN Jin-shui
Affiliation:Fuzhou General Hospital, Nanjing Military Command Area, Fuzhou 350025
Abstract:In some judicatory cases of compensation for malpractice,some were suitable for"General Principles of the Civil Law",but others applied to"Disposal Regulation for Malpractice".This phenomenon led to binary as- sessment and standard for compensation.The author proposed to set down"Disposal Regulation for Malpractice"which would be of a higher law order,and combining"General Principles of the Civil Law"and"Disposal regula- tion for malpractice".
Keywords:compensation for malpractice  applicable law  binary orientation  countermeasure
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号