首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

骨髓腔内途径脐血与间质干细胞共移植对造血重建的实验研究
引用本文:蔡耘,黄绍良,张绪超,黄永兰,黄科,陈惠芹,李萍.骨髓腔内途径脐血与间质干细胞共移植对造血重建的实验研究[J].中国病理生理杂志,2008,24(1):139-143.
作者姓名:蔡耘  黄绍良  张绪超  黄永兰  黄科  陈惠芹  李萍
作者单位:1中山大学附属第二医院儿科, 广东 广州 510120; 2暨南大学附属第一医院放疗科, 广东 广州 510632
基金项目:卫生部临床学科重点资助项目[No.(2004)468]
摘    要:目的:探讨骨髓腔内输注(IBM)脐血与间质干细胞(MSCs)对大鼠造血重建、骨髓MSCs恢复的影响,并研究供体MSCs植入状态以探讨MSCs的作用机制。方法:BrdU标记F344大鼠骨髓MSCs通过双侧胫骨IBM或尾静脉注射(IV)与胎鼠及新生大鼠外周血(FNPB)共移植Wistar雌鼠。监测受鼠存活状况、造血免疫重建、HSCs植入水平及骨髓MSCs恢复情况,并以免疫荧光法检测受鼠骨髓MSCs的来源。结果:(1)2个共移植组60 d存活率均为100%,单纯FNPB移植组仅为66.7%。(2)共移植组的外周血象、骨髓造血干祖细胞集落产率明显高于单纯FNPB移植组,尤以骨髓腔共移植组最佳。(3)2个共移植组的HSCs植入水平无统计学差异,而骨髓腔共移植组明显高于单纯FNPB移植组(P<0.05)。(4)30 d时各移植组MSCs的增殖能力未达正常水平,但仍以骨髓腔共移植组的恢复情况最佳(P<0.05)。(5)仅少部分受体可发现供、受体源性MSCs嵌合。 结论:脐血与MSCs共移植可促进受体骨髓MSCs恢复和造血重建,提高HSCs植入率;IBM途径应用安全,促进造血恢复的作用优于IV途径。

关 键 词:骨髓  脐血移植  间质干细胞  
文章编号:1000-4718(2008)01-0139-05
收稿时间:2006-07-20
修稿时间:2006-09-15

Effects of cotransplantation of umbilical cord blood and mesenchymal stem cells by intra-bone marrow injection on hematopoietic reconstitution in a rat model
CAI Yun,HUANG Shao-liang,ZHANG Xu-chao,HUANG Yong-lan,HUANG Ke,CHEN Hui-qin,LI Ping.Effects of cotransplantation of umbilical cord blood and mesenchymal stem cells by intra-bone marrow injection on hematopoietic reconstitution in a rat model[J].Chinese Journal of Pathophysiology,2008,24(1):139-143.
Authors:CAI Yun  HUANG Shao-liang  ZHANG Xu-chao  HUANG Yong-lan  HUANG Ke  CHEN Hui-qin  LI Ping
Institution:1Department of Pediatrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China; 2Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China. E-mail:hshl@gzsums.edu.cn
Abstract:AIM: To investigate the effects of cotransplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and umbilical cord blood (UCB) by intra-bone marrow (IBM) injection on the hematopoietic reconstitution and recovery of bone marrow MSCs in the recipients. METHODS: Wistar female rats were transplanted with fetal and neonatal peripheral blood (FNPB) and BrdU-labeled MSCs separated from BMNCs of F344 rats. The MSCs were infused by IBM injection in bilateral tibiae or intravenous injection (IV), while the FNPB was all via IBM route. The survival rate, reconstitution of hematopoietic and immunological function, engraftment level of HSCs and recovery of bone marrow (BM)-MSCs in recipients were monitored. The origins of BM-MSCs of recipients were examined by immunofluorescence assay. RESULTS: (1)The survival rate in the two cotransplantation groups was 100% at day 60, while that in FNPB group was only 66.7%. (2)The counts of peripheral blood cells and BM hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell colonies of the recipients were better in cotransplantation groups than those in FNPB group, especially in the FNPB (IBM)+MSC (IBM) group. (3)No significant difference between of engraftment level of HSCs in the two cotransplantation groups was observed. The percentage of RT1A1 cells subset in FNPB (IBM)+MSC (IBM) group was much higher than that in FNPB group (P<0.05). (4)At day 30, the growth characteristic of recipient BM-MSCs was still below normal, but that in FNPB (IBM)+MSC (IBM) group was the best of all the experiment groups (P<0.05). (5)The donor MSCs coexisted with host MSCs in only a few recipient rats. CONCLUSION: The cotransplantation of MSCs and FNPB can accelerate the recovery of recipient BM-MSCs and hematopoietic reconstitution, promote the engraftment level of HSCs. Cotransplantation by IBM route is safe and has better effects on hematopoietic reconstitution than by IV route.
Keywords:Bone marrow  Umbilical cord blood transplantation  Mesenchymal stem cells  Hematopoietic remodeling
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国病理生理杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国病理生理杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号