一对一责任制助产对产妇分娩的影响

目的：分析一对一责任制助产与传统助产模式对产妇分娩的影响。方法选取近2年在我院分娩的200例产妇，随机将其分为对照组和观察组，平均每组100例。观察组给予一对一责任制助产，对照组给予传统助产模式，对比分析2组产妇分娩效果。结果观察组产妇SDS评分（34.88±3.44）分、SAS评分（27.45±1.87）分，明显低于对照组产妇的SDS评分（53.45±4.22），SAS评分（58.22±2.18）；观察组产妇的产后出血量（248.30±80.70）mL，明显低于对照组产妇的产后出血量（402.30±145.60）mL；观察组新生儿窒息发生率26.00%，明显低于对照组的新生儿窒息发生率50.00%，2组比较差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论实施一对一责任制助产，产妇心理状态、出血量、新生儿窒息发生率明显优于传统助产模式。

Influence of one-to-one responsibility midwifery for maternity

Objective In order to better maternal childbirth, analysis the one-to-one responsibility system and traditional midwifery model of assisted birth＆#39;s influence on the Puerperal childbirth. Methods in the Past two years in our hospital 200 cases of Puerperal childbirth, its randomly divided into control group and observation group, an average of 100 People in each group, the observation groups was given one-to-one responsibility midwifery, the control group given traditional midwifery model childbirth, comparison and analysis the effect of two groups of Puerperal childbirth. Results The maternal, SAS, SDS score （34.88±3.44） Points score of observation groups significantly lower than the control group（27.45＋1.87） Points of maternal SDS score（53.45 ±4.22）, SAS score（58.22 ±2.18）, the experimental groups of maternal Postpartum haemorrhage amount mL（248.30±80.70） and neonatal asphyxia was significantly lower than the control groups 26.00% of maternal Postpartum haemorrhage amount mL （402.30 ±145.60） and neonatal asphyxia rate 50.00%, and two groups have significant difference, statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The implementation of one-on-one responsibility midwifery, maternal Psychological state, blood loss, incidence of neonatal asphyxia significantly lower than the traditional midwifery model.