Research Compensation and Lottery: An Online Empirical Pilot Study |
| |
Authors: | Masood Zangeneh Reza Barmaki Hilary Gibson-Wood Michael-Jane Levitan Rosemary Romeo Jennifer Bottoms |
| |
Institution: | (1) International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction, Auckland, New Zealand;(2) York University, Toronto, Canada;(3) University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada;(4) McGill University, Montreal, Canada;(5) Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Recruiting participants for a research project can be challenging. Incentives, particularly monetary incentives, have been
shown to increase response rates. Offering a monetary incentive for participation in a research study can become very costly
for the investigators. For this reason some researchers, including graduate students involved in under-funded projects, have
resorted to lottery compensation to attract participants. From an ethical standpoint, all participants in a research study
should be treated equally and fairly. Compensation lotteries, however, undermine equal treatment of all participants (notion
of justice) because they prevent equal distribution of rewards. In this pilot study, we were interested in exploring and understanding
the prevalence and determinants of the use of lottery compensation method by graduate students from Canadian universities
as a way of compensating participants in their research studies. A sample of 50 students from five major Canadian universities
participated. Three methods of compensation were identified in this study: cash reimbursement, grade mark and lottery draw
for a prize. Results show that the availability of funding is the main determinant of the use of lottery compensation: students
with sufficient funds were more likely to use cash incentives, while those without adequate funds were more likely to use
lottery draws. Ethical implications are further discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | Lottery Compensation Gambling Ethics |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|