Treatment of Class II, division 2 in the late growth period |
| |
Authors: | Dr. Harald Eberhard Ursula Hirschfelder |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Marktplatz 13, D-85072 Eichstätt, Germany;(2) Poliklinik für Kieferorthopädie der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | The Deckbiss with skeletal Class II jaw relationship sometimes presents a considerable therapeutic problem, particularly in the late growth period (DP3U), as regards the coordination of dental and skeletal treatment objectives. An effective treatment approach was demonstrated: a modified Herbst appliance used simultaneously with fixed appliances in the maxilla. The sample comprised 12 male (14.0±0.9 years old) and 10 female (12.3±0.4 years old) patients. Correction of the distal occlusion was achieved in all patients by means of the Herbst appliance, which was removed after an average time period of 6.4±0.2 months. In the mandible the multibracket appliances were then immediately inserted, and Class II elastics were used for retention. Maximum anchorage was required in the maxilla as well as in the mandible. Complete diagnostic records were made at the begnning of the treatment as well as 6 and 12 months later, in order to document skeletal and dental changes.A dental and skeletal Class I relationship was achieved in all cases. A significant improvement was recorded in the vertical jaw base relationship; this was still stable after a period of 12 months. In the dental area in particular, a so-called high-pull headgear effect (intrusion and distalization 16, 26) and intrusion of teeth 34, 44 were registered. Only a minor protrusion of the mandibular incisors was observed. Reinforcement of the bands reduced the failure rate significantly.The Herbst appliance does not represent a standard treatment for Class II. Its indication range is limited. |
| |
Keywords: | Class II division 2 treatment Late growth period DP3U Class II elastics Herbst appliance Retention |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|