Double-blind randomized controlled trial on efficacy of cupulolith repositioning maneuver for treatment of apogeotropic horizontal canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Abstract

Backgrounds: Although various therapeutic maneuvers have been proposed, it is still unclear which maneuver is better to treat apogeotropic horizontal canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (HC-BPPV).

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the therapeutic efficacy of the cupulolith repositioning maneuver (CuRM) in apogeotropic HC-BPPV in comparison with the therapeutic head-shaking maneuver and modified Lempert maneuver.

Materials and Method: This is double-blind randomized prospective study. Forty-nine consecutive patients diagnosed with apogeotropic HC-BPPV were allocated randomly to CuRM (n?=?18), therapeutic head-shaking (n?=?16), or modified Lempert maneuver (n?=?15). The presence of nystagmus and vertigo on positional testing were evaluated at 30?min, on 1?day, and 1?week after treatment.

Results: There were no significant differences in any clinical characteristics between the three groups at randomization. After a single trial of therapeutic maneuvers on the initial visit day, the CuRM (38.9%) and therapeutic head shaking maneuver (12.5%) did not show differences compared to modified Lempert maneuver (33.3%). The therapeutic effects on the 2nd day and at 1?week after treatment also did not differ between the three groups.

Conclusions: Although the CuRM is theoretically considered to be a better therapeutic method, the therapeutic efficacy of CuRM was not statistically different compared to the other two maneuvers.