Hepatic adrenal rest tumor: Diagnostic pitfall and proposed algorithms to prevent misdiagnosis as lipid‐rich hepatocellular carcinoma |
| |
Authors: | Tomoko Sugiyama Takuma Tajiri Shinichiro Hiraiwa Chie Inomoto Hiroshi Kajiwara Seiichiro Kojima Kouske Tobita Naoya Nakamura |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;2. Department of Pathology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan;3. Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;4. Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokyo, Japan |
| |
Abstract: | We present a case of adrenal rest tumor of the liver in which differential diagnosis from lipid rich‐hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was challenging. The patient was a 50‐year‐old woman in whom a 3‐cm tumorous mass was discovered in segment 7 of the liver during computed tomography evaluation of a uterine leiomyoma. The preoperative diagnosis was HCC, and subsegmental liver resection was performed. The tumor appeared as a well‐demarcated golden yellow nodule consisting of clear or partially eosinophilic cells arranged in a trabecular pattern. The initial impression of this lesion was that of clear cell type or lipid‐rich type HCC because it stained positive for Hep Par1, but negative for arginase‐1 and positive for CD56 which is one of the neuroendocrine markers. The lesion also stained positive for SF‐1 and 3β‐HSD, both of which are markers of adrenocortical tissue. The final diagnosis was hepatic adrenal rest tumor. Hepatic adrenal rest tumor should be considered in the differential diagnosis of segment 7 tumor. A diagnostic algorithm that includes immunohistochemical staining for CD56 and arginase‐1 is to rule out the possibility of lipid‐rich HCC. |
| |
Keywords: | adrenal rest tumor of the liver arginase‐1 CD56 hepatocellular carcinoma |
|
|