Using the urine dipstick to screen out unnecessary urine cultures: implementation at one facility. |
| |
Authors: | Patricia Reilly Laura Mills Daniel Bessmer Celia Jimenez Patrick Simpson Mark Burton |
| |
Institution: | Immunology and Microbiology Laboratories, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland AFB TX, USA. patricia.reilly@aviano.af.mil |
| |
Abstract: | This study examined the utility of performing urine cultures on biochemically negative urine specimens and details the implementation of a policy to cancel these cultures. Four reactions of the Multistix SG (Bayer, Elkhart IN) urine dipstick (protein, occult blood, leukocyte esterase, and nitrite) were used as biochemical indicators. A three-month retrospective study examining the results of 843 urinalysis/ urine culture pairs indicated that one-third of these cultures were probably unnecessary (negative dipstick/negative culture). Based on these results, a policy was implemented to screen those urine samples having both a urinalysis and urine culture ordered. Over a six-month period, 6,192 urine specimens were evaluated. Of these, 36% (2,260 cultures) were cancelled. Of the 3,932 samples cultured 22.4% (883) were true positives (positive dipstick/positive culture) while 31.6% (1245) had a positive dipstick but grew organisms considered contaminants. The false positive rate was 40% (positive dipstick/negative culture), and the false negative rate was 6%. Implementation of this policy reduced the number of urines cultured by 36%. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|