首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

土壤中暗色真菌分离方法的研究
引用本文:胡晓艳,席丽艳,鲁长明,董琛,鲁莎. 土壤中暗色真菌分离方法的研究[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2008, 41(8): 515-518
作者姓名:胡晓艳  席丽艳  鲁长明  董琛  鲁莎
作者单位:中山大学附属第五医院广州市中山大学附属第二医院皮肤科广州中山大学附属第二医院皮肤科太原市山西医科大学第二医院皮肤性病科
摘    要:目的 寻找经济有效的土壤中暗色真菌的分离方法。方法 将一份含有暗色真菌的土壤样品悬液10倍比稀释成4个浓度,并配成含抗生素和不含抗生素2组,8支样品液分别接种于沙氏葡萄糖蛋白胨培养基(SDA)、马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂培养基(PDA)、孟加拉红培养基,各培养基含有0,100,200,300,500 mg/L 5个浓度的放线菌酮和100万U/L青霉素,50 mg/L氯霉素,200 mg/L链霉素,分别采用涂布法与倾注法培养,每种培养基共接种80个平皿。结果 三种培养基的分离效率分别为:PDA 70%,孟加拉红67.5%,SDA 3.75%。土壤液稀释100倍和培养基中放线菌酮质量浓度为200 mg/L时的分离效率最高,土壤液原液和稀释100倍时分离效率在PDA分别为50%和85%,两组比较,P < 0.05;在孟加拉红培养基分别为45%和85%,两组比较,P < 0.05。各培养基中无放线菌酮和放线菌酮质量浓度为200 mg/L时分离率分别为PDA 31.25%和87.5%,两组比较,P < 0.05;孟加拉红培养基分别为37.5%和81.25%,两组比较,P < 0.05。样本液中加抗生素和不加抗生素分离率比较,差异无统计学意义。各培养基涂布法与倾注法比较,总的分离率差异无统计学意义,但样品液中不加放线菌酮等抗生素时,倾注法比涂布法分离效率高,PDA分别为80%和40%,孟加拉红分别为80%和30%,各自比较差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 改良的马铃薯、孟加拉红培养基是适合土壤中暗色真菌分离的培养基,培养基中放线菌酮浓度为200 mg/L为最适浓度,采用倾注平板法时方便、经济、有效。

关 键 词:土壤  暗色真菌  分离  
收稿时间:2007-08-29
修稿时间:2007-12-18

Evaluation of methods for isolation of dematiaceous fungi from soil
HU Xiao-Yan. Evaluation of methods for isolation of dematiaceous fungi from soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Dermatology, 2008, 41(8): 515-518
Authors:HU Xiao-Yan
Abstract:Objective To seek a cost-effective method for isolation of dematiaceous fungi from soil.Methods Four concentrations of soil suspension samples were prepared by ten-fold serial dilution(1,1:10,1:100,1:1000).Then,each concentration of sample was divided into two parts:one part supplemented with antibiotics,including chloramphenicol,cycloheximide,penicilin and streptomycin,and the other free of antibiotics.Three culture media were prepared:Sabouraud's dextrose agar(SDA),potato dextrose agar (PDA)and rose bengal medium(RBM).Various concentrations(0,100,200,300,500 mg/L)of cyeloheximide were added into each culture medium along with defined concentration of penicillin(1000 u/mL)and streptomycin(0.2 g/L).In addition,chloramphenicol(50 mg/L)was added to PDA.The prepared soil samples were inoculated into these media by spread plate and pour plate,respectively.Results The total isolation rate of dematiaceous fungi was 70%(56/80)for PDA,67.5%(54/80)for RBM and 3.75%(3/80)for SDA.PDA and RBM were more efficient than SDA(both P<0,05).Significant difference was observed in the isolation rate of dematiaceous fungi between the original and 1:100 diluted soil suspension samples in PDA(50%vs 85%,P<0.05)and RBM(45%vs 85%,P<0.05).An increased isolation rate was achieved in PDA(87.50%vs 31.25%)and RBM(81.25%vs 37.5%)with cycloheximide at 200 mg/L compared with those free of cycloheximide.No differenee was found in the isolation rate between antibiotic-supplemented and antibiotic-free soil samples.Although there was no diffefence in the total isolation rate between spead plate and pour plate,a higher isolation rate was observed by pour plate from antibiotic-free soil samples in PDA(80% vs 40%,P<0.05)and RBM(80% vs 30%,P<0.05)compared with spread plate.Condusions The modified PDA and RBM are suitable for the isolation of dematiaceous fungi from soil with the optimal concentration of cyeloheximide being 200 mg/L in the medium.Pour plate is more convenient and cost-effective than spread plate for the isolation of dematiaceous fungi from soil.
Keywords:Soil  Dematiaceae fungi  Isolation
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华皮肤科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华皮肤科杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号