Sexual assault and MDMA: the distinction between consciousness and awareness when it comes to consent |
| |
Authors: | M. Abondo R. Bouvet A. Baert I. Morel M. Le Gueut |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Service de médecine légale, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033 Rennes, France;(2) Centre Anti-Poison, Unité de Toxicovigilance, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, 35033 Rennes, France;(3) Laboratoire des services de réanimation et de toxicologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, 35033 Rennes, France |
| |
Abstract: | In France, the term chemical or drug-assisted submission is usually defined as the rendering of a person vulnerable by the surreptitious administration of an active substance with the purpose of prejudicing the person or his/her possessions. If the harm is sexual assault, establishing the victim’s submission involves both proving that a dangerous substance was administered, providing material evidence of the infraction (the assault), i.e. the detection of traces in a physical examination and samples, and proving the absence of consent. We report the case of a woman who was sexually assaulted after having been surreptitiously administered methylenedioxymethamphetamine. In this special case, the woman remained in a state of vigilance (conscious) throughout, so there is doubt about whether or not she consented. In other words, the ability to consent is debatable. |
| |
Keywords: | Drug-assisted submission MDMA Sexual assault |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|