首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Commentary on ‘Designs for dose–escalation trials with quantitative responses’
Authors:William F. Rosenberger  Zorayr Manukyan
Affiliation:Department of Statistics, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive MS 4A7, Fairfax, VA 22030‐4444, U.S.A.
Abstract:Bailey (Statist. Medi 2009; this issue) puts the focus on efficiency in dose‐finding studies and shows that some quite simple modifications to much current experimentation can lead to significant efficiency gains. Efficiency has not been the main focus of interest in this field, in particular when dealing with situations requiring other than healthy volunteers. Dr Bailey's results are important, both in theory and in practice and also raise the question as to what ought to be the guiding principle to statistical workers in this field. Safety, although escaping any simple definition, has mostly guided experimentation in dose‐finding studies; one reason being that the concept is one on which clinicians and statisticians can come to some broad agreement. Finding such agreement may still be the single major difficulty in these studies, alongside the establishment of criteria that all of the scientists involved believe are the most appropriate and useful ones. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords:clinical trials  dose escalation  dose‐finding studies  maximum tolerated dose  Rolling Six design  Phase 1  safety  toxicity
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号