首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

肠道准备后2h即行无痛肠镜检查的安全性及有效性研究
引用本文:黄建朋,袁晓珊,宗华,陶红光,朱胜彬,杨骏波,李莹. 肠道准备后2h即行无痛肠镜检查的安全性及有效性研究[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2022, 28(2): 12-15
作者姓名:黄建朋  袁晓珊  宗华  陶红光  朱胜彬  杨骏波  李莹
作者单位:深圳市第三人民医院 胃肠外科,广东 深圳 518100
基金项目:白求恩·爱惜康卓越外科基金项目(No:HZB-20181119-16)
摘    要:目的 探讨肠道准备后2 h即行无痛肠镜检查的安全性及有效性.方法 将120名志愿者随机分为观察组和对照组,观察组行快速肠道准备,对照组行常规肠道准备.比较两组患者肠道准备过程中恶心、呕吐发生率、检查完成率、检查时长、检查过程中误吸发生率、息肉检出率和Boston肠道准备量表(BBPS)评分.结果 两组患者均全部完成检查...

关 键 词:快速肠道准备  禁饮时间  肠道准备质量  不良反应  安全
收稿时间:2021-04-19

Safety and effectiveness of painless colonoscopy within 2 hours after bowel preparation
Jian-peng Huang,Xiao-shan Yuan,Hua Zong,Hong-guang Tao,Sheng-bin Zhu,Jun-bo Yang,Ying Li. Safety and effectiveness of painless colonoscopy within 2 hours after bowel preparation[J]. China Journal of Endoscopy, 2022, 28(2): 12-15
Authors:Jian-peng Huang  Xiao-shan Yuan  Hua Zong  Hong-guang Tao  Sheng-bin Zhu  Jun-bo Yang  Ying Li
Affiliation:(Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,the Third People’s Hospital,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518100,China)
Abstract:Objective To explore the safety and effectiveness of painless colonoscopy within 2 hours after bowel preparation.Methods 120 volunteers were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The observation group received rapid bowel preparation and the control group received conventional bowel preparation. The incidence of nausea and vomiting, the completion rate of the examination, the time-consuming of the examination, the incidence of aspiration during the examination, polyp detection rate and the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores were compared between the two groups during the bowel preparation process.Results The two groups of volunteers all completed the examination. During the examination, there were no adverse events such as vomiting or aspiration. The average examination time of the observation group and the control group were (15.50 ± 4.41) and (17.07 ± 4.43) min, the polyp detection rate was 28.3% (17/60) and 31.7% (19/60) respectively, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidences of nausea and vomiting during bowel preparation in the two groups were 36.7% (22/60) and 63.3% (38/60) respectively, and the BBPS scores were (8.88 ± 0.32) and (8.63 ± 0.55), respectively, there were statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).Conclusion For healthy people who have no symptoms of digestive tract, in the case of rapid bowel preparation, a painless colonoscopy can be performed 2 hours after bowel preparation, which does not increase the chance of aspiration, does not affect the quality of bowel preparation, and can significantly reduce the nausea and vomiting during bowel preparation.
Keywords:rapid bowel preparation  no drinking time  quality of bowel preparation  adverse effects  safety
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国内镜杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国内镜杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号