Correlation of Levels and Patterns of Genomic Instability With Histological Grading of DCIS |
| |
Authors: | Rachel E. Ellsworth Darrell L. Ellsworth Brad Love Heather L. Patney Laurel R. Hoffman Jennifer Kane Jeffrey A. Hooke Craig D. Shriver |
| |
Affiliation: | Clinical Breast Care Project, Windber Research Institute, 620 Seventh Street, Windber, PA 15963, USA. r.ellsworth@wriwindber.org |
| |
Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Histological grading of ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) lesions separates DCIS into three subgroups (well-, moderately, or poorly differentiated). It is unclear, however, whether breast disease progresses along a histological continuum or whether each grade represents a separate disease. In this study, levels and patterns of allelic imbalance (AI) were examined in DCIS lesions to develop molecular models that can distinguish pathological classifications of DCIS. METHODS: Laser microdissected DNA samples were collected from DCIS lesions characterized by a single pathologist including well- (n = 18), moderately (n = 35), and poorly differentiated (n = 47) lesions. A panel of 52 microsatellite markers representing 26 chromosomal regions commonly altered in breast cancer was used to assess patterns of AI. RESULTS: The overall frequency of AI increased significantly (P < .001) with increasing grade (well differentiated, 12%; moderately differentiated, 17%; poorly differentiated, 26%). Levels of AI were not significantly different between well- and moderately differentiated grades of disease but were significantly higher (P < .0001) in poorly differentiated compared with well- or moderately differentiated disease. No statistically significant differences in patterns of AI were detected between well- and moderately differentiated disease; however, AI occurred significantly more frequently (P < .05) in high-grade lesions at chromosomes 6q25-q27, 8q24, 9p21, 13q14, and 17p13.1, and significantly more frequently in low-grade lesions at chromosome 16q22.3-q24.3. CONCLUSIONS: The inability to discriminate DCIS at the genetic level suggests that grades 1 and 2 DCIS may represent a single, non-high-grade form of DCIS, whereas poorly differentiated DCIS seems to be a genetically more advanced disease that may represent a discrete disease entity, characterized by a unique spectrum of genetic alterations. |
| |
Keywords: | Allelic imbalance Ductal carcinoma-in-situ Genomic instability Histological grade Tumor classification |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|