3D time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) of the carotid arteries with time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories: comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced Bolus-Chase MRA and 3D time-of-flight MRA

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) offers the combined advantage of large anatomic coverage and hemodynamic flow information. We applied parallel imaging and time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories (TWIST), which uses a spiral trajectory to undersample k-space, to perform time-resolved MRA of the extracranial internal carotid arteries and compare it to time-of-flight (TOF) and high-resolution contrast-enhanced (HR) MRA.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 31 patients who underwent carotid MRA at 1.5T using TOF, time-resolved and HR MRA was performed. Images were evaluated for the presence and degree of ICA stenosis, reader confidence, and number of pure arterial frames attained with the TWIST technique.RESULTS: With a consensus interpretation of all sequences as the reference standard, accuracy for identifying stenosis was 90.3% for TWIST MRA, compared with 96.0% and 88.7% for HR MRA and TOF MRA, respectively. HR MRA was significantly more accurate than the other techniques (P < .05). TWIST MRA yielded datasets with high in-plane spatial resolution and distinct arterial and venous phases. It provided dynamic information not otherwise available. Mean diagnostic confidence was satisfactory or greater for TWIST in all patients.CONCLUSION: The TWIST technique consistently obtained pure arterial phase images while providing dynamic information. It is rapid, uses a low dose of contrast, and may be useful in specific circumstances, such as in the acute stroke setting. However, it does not yet have spatial resolution comparable with standard contrast-enhanced MRA.

Stroke has an estimated prevalence of 5.7 million (2.6%) adults in the United States, where it is the third most common cause of mortality.¹ Atherosclerotic carotid artery disease is an important risk factor for anterior circulation ischemic stroke. Imaging evaluation is essential for optimal management and stroke prevention, as demonstrated in studies of symptomatic^2,3 and asymptomatic populations.^4,5 Carotid dissection is another potential cause of anterior circulation ischemia, which also requires high-spatial-resolution imaging for definitive diagnosis.Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains the gold standard for assessment of the cervical vasculature,⁶ with excellent spatial and temporal resolution. However, risks include vascular injury, intracerebral complications, contrast nephrotoxicity, and exposure to ionizing radiation. Therefore, noninvasive techniques are typically used initially. Duplex Doppler sonography, CT angiography (CTA), and MR angiography (MRA) all have high but varying degrees of sensitivity and specificity, ranging from 70% to 99% for carotid stenosis detection.⁷ Although sonography provides excellent dynamic information and spatial resolution, insonation window limitations restrict anatomic coverage. Similarly, long imaging times with time-of-flight (TOF) MRA also limit anatomic coverage. CTA and conventional arterial contrast-enhanced MRA offer extensive coverage but provide no dynamic information and are dependent on accurate timing for optimal visualization of the arterial tree.3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography (TR MRA) has been previously described.⁸ TR MRA offers combined anatomic and hemodynamic information and obtains pure arterial and venous phase images consistently and rapidly without a timing run. More recently, the technique has been specifically applied to the extracranial carotid arteries using parallel imaging or keyhole imaging techniques.^9,10 In this study, we report the diagnostic accuracy of TR MRA of the extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) acquired with a combination of parallel imaging (generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition [GRAPPA])¹¹ and time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories (TWIST), a new view-sharing technique, which undersamples the periphery of k-space depending on the radial distance from the center of k-space.^12,13 We compared TR MRA with 3D high-resolution contrast enhanced MRA (HR MRA) and 3D TOF MRA.