首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

超声造影对肝癌射频消融筛选适应证的应用价值
引用本文:Chen MH,Wu W,Yang W,Gao W,Dai Y,Yin SS,Huo L,Yan K. 超声造影对肝癌射频消融筛选适应证的应用价值[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2005, 85(49): 3491-3494
作者姓名:Chen MH  Wu W  Yang W  Gao W  Dai Y  Yin SS  Huo L  Yan K
作者单位:100036,北京大学临床肿瘤学院,北京肿瘤医院超声科
基金项目:北京市科委重大项目培育专项基金资助项目(Z0005190040431);北京大学医学部“十五”“211工程”重点学科建设项目经费资助项目(523)
摘    要:目的通过射频消融前超声造影观察肿瘤大小、数目及分布,探讨其对筛选适应证的应用价值.方法北京大学临床肿瘤学院超声科就诊的164例确诊肝细胞癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)并符合经皮射频消融(radiofrequency Ablation,RFA)入选标准患者,随机分为两组进行对照研究.81例射频消融前采用SonoVue行超声造影(contrast-enhanced ultrasound,CEUS)检查(CEUS组),83例射频消融前未行超声造影检查(对照组).男121例、女43例;年龄38~72岁,平均52.4岁.造影前两组病例的临床资料差异无统计学意义.肿瘤平均直径超声造影组3.6 cm,对照组3.5 cm.治疗后采用常规超声,增强CT和/或超声造影等影像检查进行规律性随访.结果超声造影组81例造影后9例(11.1%)因发现肿瘤数目 〉5个 (5例)、范围测量〉8 cm(2例)、侵及2支大血管或肠管(2例)被确定为非射频消融适应证,余72例101灶行射频消融治疗.其中超声造影新发现≤1.7 cm 8例12灶中,5例为肝硬化及肝细胞癌治疗后随访病例,3例7个灶为肝细胞癌卫星灶.另有16灶为常规超声不能定性或误诊良性,经超声造影确认并指导射频消融治疗.两组随访6~36个月,超声造影组与对照组消融成功率分别为95.0%和89.6%(P〉0.05).对照组新生率高于超声造影组(22.9% vs 9.7%,P〈0.05).结论射频消融前超声造影有助于筛选适应证,显著减少新生转移病例.造影所获信息为早期检出微小癌灶提供了手段和依据,从而有效的提高射频消融对肝癌的治疗水平.

关 键 词:超声检查 导管消融术 肝癌 射频消融 适应证 超声造影
收稿时间:2005-08-05
修稿时间:2005-08-05

Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in selecting indication of radiofrequency ablation among hepatocellular carcinoma patients
Chen Min-hua,Wu Wei,Yang Wei,Gao Wen,Dai Ying,Yin Shan-shan,Huo Ling,Yan Kun. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in selecting indication of radiofrequency ablation among hepatocellular carcinoma patients[J]. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi, 2005, 85(49): 3491-3494
Authors:Chen Min-hua  Wu Wei  Yang Wei  Gao Wen  Dai Ying  Yin Shan-shan  Huo Ling  Yan Kun
Affiliation:Department of Ultrasound, School of Oncology, Peking University, Beijing 100036, China
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in selection of the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) indicated to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: 164 patients with HCC, 121 males and 43 females, aged 52.4 (38-72), who asked for RFA were randomly divided into 2 groups: 81 patients undergoing CEUS before RFA (CEUS Group), and 83 patients not undergoing CEUS before RFA (Control Group). There were not significant differences in the TNM staging, liver function Child-Pugh classing, and average tumor size between the 2 groups. Follow-up by conventional ultrasonography, enhanced CT and/or enhanced ultrasonography was conducted for 6-36 months. RESULTS: Nine of the 81 patients in CEUS Group (11.8%) were determined by CEUS as unsuitable for RFA; 5 of the 9 patients had more than 5 lesions, 2 of the 9 patients had lesions > 8 cm in diameter, and the tumor had invaded 2 large vessels or intestine in 2 of the 9 patients. The other 72 patients in CEUS Group, with 101 lesions, underwent RFA after CEUS. CEUS discovered 12 lesions < or = 1.7 cm that had not been discovered by conventional ultrasonography and CT in 8 patients, 3 of which were patients with cirrhosis undergoing follow-up, and 2 of which were HCC patients undergoing follow-up after treatment. Of these 8 patients, 3 had 7 newly discovered satellite lesions around the main lesions. The successful rates of CEUS Group and Control Group were 95.0% and 89.6% respectively (P > 0.05). The distant recurrence rate of Control Group was 22.9%, significantly higher than that of CEUS Group (9.7%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Helping find minute tumors, CEUS is useful in selecting HCC patients suitable for RFA, thus decreasing the intrahepatic recurrence after RFA.
Keywords:Ultrasonography, interventional    Catheter ablation    Carcinoma,hepotocellular
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号