首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

光动力疗法辅助治疗Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期牙周炎的临床效果评价
引用本文:范雅丹,束蓉,程岚,葛琳华.光动力疗法辅助治疗Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期牙周炎的临床效果评价[J].上海口腔医学,2022,31(5):501-506.
作者姓名:范雅丹  束蓉  程岚  葛琳华
作者单位:上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院 牙周病科,上海交通大学口腔医学院,国家口腔医学中心, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海 200011
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81600863)
摘    要:目的: 探讨光动力疗法(photodynamic therapy,PDT)辅助龈下刮治术(subgingival scaling and root planning,SRP)在Ⅲ、Ⅳ期牙周炎治疗中的临床效果。方法: 根据2018年牙周病新分类,选择Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期牙周炎患者,经龈上洁治1周后,记录牙周探诊深度(probing depth, PD)、牙龈指数(gingival index, GI)和探诊出血(bleeding on probing,BOP)为基线。将患者分为3组,SRP组进行SRP治疗;PDT1组在SRP后即刻对口内所有PD≥5 mm的位点进行PDT;PDT2组在SRP+PDT后6周,对原位点再进行1次PDT。基线治疗后3、6个月复查,比较PD、GI和BOP阳性率的变化。采用SPSS 22.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 共纳入30例患者、1 289个位点。SRP组、PDT1组和PDT2组各10例患者,位点数分别为476个(36.9%)、384个(29.8%)和429个(33.3%)。3组治疗后3个月、6个月复查时,PD、GI、BOP阳性率较基线均显著降低(P<0.05); 6个月与3个月的复查结果无显著差异。PD≥5 mm的位点,PDT1组和PDT2组可以显著降低患牙的GI和BOP阳性率(P<0.05);PD≥7 mm时,PDT2组PD显著降低(P<0.05)。结论: 对于Ⅲ、Ⅳ期牙周炎,PDT辅助SRP治疗可以获得比单纯SRP更好的临床效果。

关 键 词:光动力疗法  龈下刮治术  晚期牙周炎  
收稿时间:2022-04-15
修稿时间:2022-06-24

Effectiveness of adjunctive photodynamic therapy in the treatment of stage Ⅲ, Ⅳ periodontitis
FAN Ya-dan,SHU Rong,CHENG Lan,GE Lin-hua.Effectiveness of adjunctive photodynamic therapy in the treatment of stage Ⅲ, Ⅳ periodontitis[J].Shanghai Journal of Stomatology,2022,31(5):501-506.
Authors:FAN Ya-dan  SHU Rong  CHENG Lan  GE Lin-hua
Institution:Department of Periodontology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China
Abstract:PURPOSE: To explore the clinical effect of subgingival scaling and root planning (SRP) with adjunctive photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ periodontitis. METHODS: According to 2018 Classification of Periodontitis, patients diagnosed as stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ periodontitis were recruited. One week after supragingival scaling, probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP) and gingival index (GI) were recorded as the baseline. All patients were divided into 3 groups, SRP group received whole mouth SRP treatment; PDT1 group: PDT at all sites with PD≥5 mm immediately after SRP; PDT2 group received another PDT at the test sites 6 weeks after full mouth SRP+PDT. PD, GI and the positive rates of BOP were compared 3 months and 6 months after treatment. SPSS 22.0 software package was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Thirty patients and 1 289 test sites were included in this trial. There were 10 patients in group SRP, PDT1 and PDT2, and the number of tests sites were 476, 36.9%, 384, 29.8% and 429 33.3%, respectively. The PD, GI and the positive rates of BOP in the three groups were reduced at 3-months and 6-months of follow-up (P<0.05), there was no significant difference between 3-months and 6-months of follow-up. At the site of PD≥5 mm, group PDT1 and PDT2 could significantly reduce GI and the positive rates of BOP at the test sites(P<0.05). When PD≥7 mm, significant PD reduction was observed in group PDT2(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ periodontitis, PDT assisted with SRP therapy can achieve better clinical effect than SRP alone.
Keywords:Photodynamic therapy  Subgingival scaling and root planning  Advanced periodontitis  
点击此处可从《上海口腔医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《上海口腔医学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号