首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

比较标准超声波测量仪和新型光学生物测量仪计算人工晶状体屈光度的准确性
引用本文:Faruk Kay,Ibrahim Koak,Ali Aydin,Hakan Baybor,Koray Karadayi. 比较标准超声波测量仪和新型光学生物测量仪计算人工晶状体屈光度的准确性[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2016, 16(5): 807-810. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2016.5.04
作者姓名:Faruk Kay,Ibrahim Ko  ak,Ali Aydin,Hakan Baybor,Koray Karadayi
作者单位:1. 土耳其,伊斯坦布尔34214,Bagcilar,Medipol大学,医学院,眼科;2. 土耳其,伊斯坦布尔34214,Bagcilar,Medipol大学,医学院,眼科; 土耳其,伊斯坦布尔 34196,Bah?elievler,Fatih Cad,Nisa医院,眼科;3. 土耳其,梅尔辛33000,尼科西亚,Near East大学,眼科
摘    要:目的:比较超乳手术时应用新型光学生物测量仪和标准超声波测量仪计算人工晶状体的屈光度及屈光结果。
  方法:前瞻性研究。研究包含37例37眼白内障患者接受白内障超声乳化联合人工晶状体植入术。同一测量人员分别使用新型光学生物测量仪( Aladdin)与标准超声波测量仪( Sonoled AB 5500)对白内障患者进行检测。通过这两种设备记录生物测定参数,包括眼轴长度、角膜曲率、前房深度及人工晶状体屈光度数。分析术后实际屈光不正与两台设备根据SRK/T公式计算的误差,比较两台设备检查结果的平均估计误差( EE )、平均绝对估计误差( AEE)及生物测定参数。
  结果:Aladdin测量仪(23.45±0.73 ll )较超声波测量仪(23.2±0.75 ll)检测出的眼轴显著较长(P=0.01)。Aladdin测量仪的EE与AEE均明显小于超声波测量仪( P=0.0006与0.03)。应用Aladdin测量的大多数眼与目标屈光度相差在±0.5(67%)及±1.00(97%)以内。
  结论:Aladdin光学生物测量仪较超声波测量仪更精确,屈光结果更准确。

关 键 词:Aladdin光学生物测量仪  超声波测量仪  眼轴长  人工晶状体屈光度数  术后屈光不正
收稿时间:2015-09-29
修稿时间:2016-02-22

Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation using a standard ultrasonic biometer and a new optical biometer
Faruk Kay,Ibrahim Ko,#xE;ak,Ali Aydin,Hakan Baybora and Koray Karadayi. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation using a standard ultrasonic biometer and a new optical biometer[J]. International Eye Science, 2016, 16(5): 807-810. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2016.5.04
Authors:Faruk Kay,Ibrahim Ko  ak,Ali Aydin,Hakan Baybora  Koray Karadayi
Abstract:AIM:To compare the intraocular lens(IOL)power calculations and refractive outcomes obtained with a new optical biometer and standard ultrasonic biometer in phacoemulsification surgery.

METHODS:Thirty-seven eyes of 37 cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation were included in this prospective comparative study. The same operator performed biometer measurements in eyes with cataract using a new optical biometer(Aladdin)and a standard ultrasonic biometer(Sonomed AB 5500). Biometric parameters; axial length(AL), keratometric(K)readings, anterior chamber depth(ACD)and IOL power obtained by two devices were recorded. Postoperative actual refractive errors and errors predicted by two devices according to SRK/T formula were analyzed. The mean estimation error(EE), mean absolute estimation error(AEE)and the biometric parameters obtained by two biometers were compared.

RESULTS:The AL measured by Aladdin(23.45±0.73 mm)was significantly longer than AL by ultrasonic biometer(23.2±0.75 mm)(P=0.01). The mean EE and AEE values obtained by Aladdin were significantly smaller than the values by ultrasonic biometer(P=0.0006 and 0.03 respectively). The higher percentage of eyes within ±0.5 and ±1.00 D of target refraction was also found by using Aladdin(67% and 97%).

CONCLUSION:The Aladdin optical biometer showed better accuracy and yielded better refractive outcomes compared with ultrasonic biometer.

Keywords:Aladdin optical biometer   ultrasonic biometer   axial length   intraocular lens power calculation   postoperative refractive error
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号