Repeated CT scans in trauma transfers: An analysis of indications,radiation dose exposure,and costs |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Phoenix Epidemiology and Clinical Research Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA;2. Clinical Core Laboratory, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA;1. Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;2. Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;3. Division of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;4. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;5. Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King''s College, London, United Kingdom |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectivesTo identify the number of CT scans repeated in acute trauma patients receiving imaging before being referred to a trauma center, to define indications, and to assess radiation doses and costs of repeated CT.MethodsThis retrospective study included all adult trauma patients transferred from other hospitals to a Level-I trauma center during 2014. Indications for repeated CT scans were categorized into: inadequate CT image data transfer, poor image quality, repetition of head CT after head injury together with completion to whole-body CT (WBCT), and follow-up of injury known from previous CT. Radiation doses from repeated CT were determined; costs were calculated using a nation-wide fee schedule.ResultsWithin one year, 85/298 (28.5%) trauma patients were transferred from another hospital because of severe head injury (n = 45,53%) and major body trauma (n = 23;27%) not manageable in the referring hospital, repatriation from a foreign country (n = 14;16.5%), and no ICU-capacity (n = 3;3.5%). Of these 85 patients, 74 (87%) had repeated CT in our center because of inadequate CT data transfer (n = 29;39%), repetition of head CT with completion to WBCT (n = 24;32.5%), and follow-up of known injury (n = 21;28.5%). None occurred because of poor image quality. Cumulative dose length product (DLP) and annual costs of potential preventable, repeated CT (inadequate data transfer) was 631mSv (81′304mGy*cm) and 35′233€, respectively.ConclusionA considerable number of transferred trauma patients undergo potentially preventable, repeated CT, adding radiation dose to patients and costs to the health care system. |
| |
Keywords: | Imaging Trauma Radiation exposure Health care costs |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|