不同方法治疗输卵管妊娠的生育结局比较

目的 探讨输卵管妊娠的治疗方法选择.方法 以有生育要求的输卵管妊娠128例为研究对象,随机分为药物治疗组（药物组）43例、腹腔镜治疗组（腹腔镜组）42例、经腹手术组（经腹组）43例,比较三组受孕状况、受孕时间、输卵管畅通情况、住院时间、出院时血中人绒毛膜促性腺激素（β-HCG）的差异.结果 腹腔镜组宫内妊娠率最高达80.9%,1年宫内妊娠率达66.7%,输卵管畅通率为78.6%,受孕时间及出院时间明显缩短,出院时β-HCG水平降低.结论 腹腔镜疗法创伤小,妊娠率高,异位妊娠率低,输卵管通畅率高,可有效提高输卵管妊娠治疗后的生育能力.

Comparison of reproductive outcome of different treatment for tubal pregnancy

Objective To investigate the choice of treatment of tubal pregnancy.Methods 128 patients with tubal pregnancy were randomly divided into 43 patients of drug group,42 cases of laparoscopy group,43 cases laparotomy group.The differences of pregnancy status,time to pregnancy,tubal smooth the situation,length of stay,discharge of blood β-HCG were compared.Results Lapamscopic surgery therapy whose intrauterine pregnancy rate reached 80.9%,one year intrauterine pregnancy rate was up to 66.7%,tubal flow rate was 78.6%,and the pregnancy and discharge time was significantly shorter,and the level of β-HCG decresaed when they would go out hospital.Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery therapy had small trauma,better pregnancy rate,low ectopic pregnancy rate,better tubal patency rate,and it could improve fertility,and make discharging quickly,and was an effective treatment for patients with tubal pregnancy.