首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中药化学成分定量分析方法学验证中精密度和准确度的探讨
引用本文:王鹏,宋宗华,李清,果德安,钱忠直,毕开顺. 中药化学成分定量分析方法学验证中精密度和准确度的探讨[J]. 中国药品标准, 2010, 11(3): 191-195
作者姓名:王鹏  宋宗华  李清  果德安  钱忠直  毕开顺
作者单位:1. 沈阳药科大学药学院,沈阳,110016
2. 国家药典委员会,北京,100061
3. 中国科学院上海药物研究所,上海,201203
摘    要:目的:研究精密度、准确度和范围的具体考察方法。方法:采用RP—HPLC法,以厚朴药材为例,对该药中厚朴酚、和厚朴酚含量进行测定,在方法学验证过程中,重复性和回收率试验分别设计不同范围和不同考察方法。结果:重复性试验结果表明厚朴酚、和厚朴酚含量的RSD分别为2.5%~5.8%,2.5%~5.7%;平均回收率厚朴酚为95.1%~97.7%(RSD:2.2%~4.3%);和厚朴酚为94.8%~97.7%(RSD=2.0%~7.5%)。结论:重复性RSD值随考察范围增大而增大,且同一浓度6份供试品溶液的测定结果与低、中、高浓度9份供试品溶液的测定结果方差非齐性。回收率RSD值亦随考察范围增大而增大。当药材取样量不同,根据被测成分含量按1:1添加对照品时,误差影响相对较小。而确定相同取样量,通过改变对照品加入量考察回收率时,9份样品测定结果RSD明显增大。

关 键 词:分析方法验证  精密度  准确度

Study on Precision and Accuracy in Method Validation for Quantitative Analysis of Components in Traditional Chinese Medicine
Wang Peng,Song Zong-hu,Li Qing,Guo De-an,Qian Zhong-zhi and Bi Kai-shun. Study on Precision and Accuracy in Method Validation for Quantitative Analysis of Components in Traditional Chinese Medicine[J]. , 2010, 11(3): 191-195
Authors:Wang Peng  Song Zong-hu  Li Qing  Guo De-an  Qian Zhong-zhi  Bi Kai-shun
Affiliation:1. School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China ;2. China Pharmacopoeia Commission, Beijing 100061, China ;3. Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Scienees, Shanghai 201203, China)
Abstract:Objective: To study the specific investigation method of precision, accuracy and range. Methods : For determination of the contents of magnolol and honokilo in cortex magnoliae offieinalis by RP-HPLC, in different range, the repeatability and accuracy were evaluated by different methods. Results: For magnolol and honokilo, RSDs of the repeatability were 2. 5-5.8% and 2. 5-5.7%. The range within ten times. The average recoveries were 95. 1-97.7% ,with RSDs of 2. 2-4. 3% and 94. 8-97. 7% ,with RSDs of 2. 0-7.5% Conclusions: RSDs of the repeatability are increased as the range enlarged, and the variance is non-homogeneous between 6 and 9 determined results. RSDs of the recoveries are increased as the range enlarged. When the ratio of added and original amount is 1 : 1, the error is little relatively But if recoveries are investigated by changing added amount of reference substance, RSD of the 9 sample results is obviously increased.
Keywords:Analytical method validation  Precision  Accuracy
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国药品标准》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国药品标准》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号