| 两种不同方法测定残气容积结果的对比分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵志强 赵新河 陈琰 王金平. 两种不同方法测定残气容积结果的对比分析[J]. 医疗设备信息, 2007, 22(8): 10-11 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵志强 赵新河 陈琰 王金平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]第三军医大学附属新桥医院,呼吸内科研究所,重庆400037 [2]郑州市武警消防支队卫生队,河南,郑州,450000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对用两种不同方法测定残气容积的结果进行对比分析,结果显示, FEV1% Pred正常时,两种方法测定的残气容积结果相差不显著（ p〉0.05）, 80% 》FEV1% Pred≥ 60%时,结果相差显著（ p〈0.05）, FEV1% Pred《60%时,结果相差非常显著（ p〈0.01）.
|
| 关 键 词： | 肺容量参数 体容积描记法 肺弥散功能法 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-7510（2007）08-0010-02 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-12-28 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-12-28 |
Comparison and Analysis on Residual Volume Results Tested with Two Different Methods |
| |
| ZHAO Zhi - qiang, ZHAO Xin - he, CHEN Yan, WANG Jin - ping. Comparison and Analysis on Residual Volume Results Tested with Two Different Methods[J]. Information of Medical Equipment, 2007, 22(8): 10-11 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAO Zhi - qiang ZHAO Xin - he CHEN Yan WANG Jin - ping |
| |
| Affiliation: | Respiratory Disease Institute Affiliated to Xinqiao Hospital under Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Compares and analyzes the results of residual volume(RV) tested with two different methods.The results show that there is no significant difference in RV tested with two different methods when FEV1% Pred is normal(p>0.05) but significant difference when FEV1% Pred was between 80% and 60%(p<0.05),and most significant difference when FEV1% Pred was lower than 60%(p<0.01). |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
