首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

一测多评法在舒肝健脾丸质量控制中的应用
引用本文:董宇,陈新. 一测多评法在舒肝健脾丸质量控制中的应用[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2014, 20(4): 70-73
作者姓名:董宇  陈新
作者单位:长春中医药大学药学院, 长春 130117;长春中医药大学药学院, 长春 130117
基金项目:吉林省科技发展计划重点项目(20100906)
摘    要:目的:建立舒肝健脾丸一测多评的测定方法,验证此方法在舒肝健脾丸质量评价中应用的准确性、适应性和可行性。方法:将舒肝健脾丸为研究对象,以橙皮苷为内参物,建立橙皮苷与柚皮苷、柑属苷B的相对校正因子,并将校正因子应用于橙皮苷、柚皮苷和柑属苷B的含量测定,实现一测多评;同时采用外标法测定上述3种黄酮类成分的含量,比较计算值与实测值的差异。结果:线性考察Y橙皮苷=56 644X-2 272.9(r=0.999 8);Y柚皮苷=41 070X+779.59(r=0.999 9);Y柑属苷B=33 619X+2 289.8(r=0.999 9),线性关系良好;校正因子,柚皮苷RSD 0.286%,柑属苷B RSD 0.259%;阴性无干扰,专属性良好;精密度,橙皮苷RSD 0.48%,柚皮苷 RSD 1.02%,柑属苷B RSD 0.97%;重复性,橙皮苷 RSD 0.94%,柚皮苷 RSD 0.89%,柑属苷B RSD 1.27%;回收率,橙皮苷平均回收率99.26%,RSD 0.90%,柚皮苷平均回收率99.30%,RSD 0.92%,柑属苷B平均回收率 98.34%RSD 0.78%,该方法准确、可靠;一测多评法柚皮苷含量为6.11,6.09,6.13 mg·g-1,柑属苷B为 4.96,4.93,4.99 mg·g-1,外标法柚皮苷含量为6.12,6.08,6.17 mg·g-1,柑属苷B为 4.98,4.95,5.01 mg·g-1,两种方法含量测定结果差异不显著。结论:一测多评法可同时对疏肝健脾丸中的橙皮苷、柚皮苷和柑属苷B进行含量测定,该方法简便、准确、可靠,可有效提高疏肝健脾丸的质量水平。

关 键 词:一测多评  高效液相色谱  相对校正因子  舒肝健脾丸
收稿时间:2013-08-24

Application of QAMS in the Quality Control of Shuganjianpi Pill
DONG Yu and CHEN Xin. Application of QAMS in the Quality Control of Shuganjianpi Pill[J]. China Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae, 2014, 20(4): 70-73
Authors:DONG Yu and CHEN Xin
Affiliation:College of Pharmacy, Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China;College of Pharmacy, Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China
Abstract:Objective: To establish the measurement method of the multi-component with a single-marker(QAMS) of Shuganjianpi pill,and verify the accuracy, adaptability, geasibility of QAMS in the quality control. Method: Shuganjianpi pill was used as the research object and the hesperidin was used as the internal reference. The relative correlation factor (RCF) of naringin and citrus genus glycosides B were established, and the RCF in the determination of naringin and citrus genus glycosides B was adopted. The external standard method(ESM) was used to determin the naringin and citrus genus glycosides B, and the results of the two determination methods were compared. Result: Linear experiment, hesperidin:Y=56 644X-2 272.9 (r=0.999 8), naringin:Y=41 070X+779.59(r=0.999 9), citrus genus glycosides B:Y=33 619X+2 289.8(r=0.999 9),linear relationship was good;RCF, naringin:RSD 0.286%, citrus genus glycosides B:RSD 0.259%;there was no negative interference,specificity was good;precision enperiment, hesperidin:RSD 0.48%, naringin:RSD 1.02%, citrus genus glycosides B:RSD 0.97%;repeatability enperiment, hesperidin:RSD 0.94%, naringin:RSD 0.89%, citrus genus glycosides B:RSD 1.27%;recovery experiment,hesperidin:average recovery was 99.26%,RSD 0.90%,naringin:average recovery was 99.30%,RSD 0.92%, citrus genus glycosides B:average recovery was 98.34%,RSD 0.78%. The method was accurate and reliable;determination result of QAMS:naringin 6.11,6.09,6.13 mg·g-1, citrus genus glycosides B 4.96,4.93,4.99 mg·g-1;ESM:naringin 6.12,6.08,6.17 mg·g-1, citrus genus glycosides B 4.98,4.95,5.01 mg·g-1, there was no significant difference in the results of determination between the two methods. Conclusion: Using QAMS can determine the hesperidin, naringin and citrus genus glycosides B in the Shuganjianpi pills simultaneously with convenience preciseness and raliablity, which effectively improve the level of Shuganjianpi pill quality control.
Keywords:multi-component with a single-marker(QAMS)  HPLC  relative correction factor(RCF)  Shuganjianpi pill
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国实验方剂学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国实验方剂学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号