|
|||||
|
|
| 知证卫生决策工具之十四——组织和开展政策对话支持知证决策 | |
| 引用本文： | John N Lavis,Jennifer Boyko,Andrew D Oxman,Simon Lewin,Atle Fretheim,文进,高霑.知证卫生决策工具之十四——组织和开展政策对话支持知证决策[J].中国循证医学杂志,2010,10(5):514-519. |
| 作者姓名： | John N Lavis Jennifer Boyko Andrew D Oxman Simon Lewin Atle Fretheim 文进 高霑 |
| 作者单位： | [1]Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of Political Science, McMaster University, 1200 Main St. West, HSC-2D3, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8N 3Z5; [2]Health Research Methodology Programme, 1200 Main St. West, HSC-2D 1, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8N 3Z5 [3]Norwegian Knowledge Centre for t~he Healih Services, P.O. Box＇7004, St. Olavs plass, N0130 Oslo, Norway [4]Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, P.O. Box 7004, St. Olavs plass, N0130 Oslo, Norway; Health Systems Research Unit, Medical Research Council of South Africa [5]Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, P.O. Box 7004, St. Olavs plass, N0130 Oslo, Norway; Section for International Health, Institute of General Practice and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway [6]不详, P.O. Box 7004, St. Olavs plass, N0130 Oslo, Norway; Section for International Health, Institute of General Practice and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway |
| 摘 要： | 政策对话允许将研究证据与受未来优先决策问题影响并参与决策的个人的观点、经验和隐性知识综合考虑。众多因素激起了对使用政策对话越来越多的关注，这些因素包括：① 认识到对决策者和其他利益相关者而言本土化“决策支持”的需要；② 认识到研究证据仅是影响决策者和其他利益相关者决策过程的因素之一；③ 认识到许多利益相关者能给决策过程注入自己的价值观或偏好；④ 认识到不仅决策者、许多利益相关者也能够采取行动解决高度优先问题。本文通过提出一些问题引导组织和开展政策对话支持知证决策。这些问题包括：① 对话是否致力于解决高度优先问题？② 对话是否提供了机会来讨论问题、问题解决方案及方案实施中需考虑的重要事项？③ 是否已通过预先发放政策简报和讨论影响决策过程的全部因素为对话提供信息？④ 对话是否确保了该问题决策参与者或将受其影响的人员代表的公平性？⑤ 该对话是否有人主持并遵循不评价个体也不强求达成共识的原则？⑥ 所得结果和后续活动是否支持行动措施？ |
| 关 键 词： | 引导组织 卫生决策 利益相关者 工具 隐性知识 本土化 价值观 公平性 |
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 14:Organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking |
|
| John N Lavis,Jennifer Boyko,rew D Oxman,Simon Lewin,Atle Fretheim . Centre for Health Economics , Policy Analysis.SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 14:Organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking[J].Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine,2010,10(5):514-519. | |
| Authors: | John N Lavis Jennifer Boyko rew D Oxman Simon Lewin Atle Fretheim Centre for Health Economics Policy Analysis |
| Institution: | 1. Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostafisfics,and Department of Political Science,McMaster University,1200 Main St.West,HSC-2D3,Hamilton,ON,Canada,L8N 3Z5 2. Health Research Methodology Programme,1200 Main St.West,HSC-2D1,Hamilton,ON,Canada,L8N 3Z5 3. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services,P.O.Box 7004,St.Olavs plass,N0130 Oslo,Norway 4. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services,P.O.Box 7004,St.Olavs plass,N0130 Oslo,Norway;Health Systems Research Unit,Medical Research Council of South Africa 5. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services,P.O.Box 7004,St.Olavs plass,N0130 Oslo,Norway;Section for International Health,Institute of General Practice and Community Medicine,Faculty of Medicine,University of Oslo,Norway |
| Abstract: | |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |