首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术与小切口胆囊切除术的对比分析
引用本文:何芳,张光全,廖忠,吴先麟,廖国庆. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术与小切口胆囊切除术的对比分析[J]. 现代临床医学, 2007, 33(5): 325-326
作者姓名:何芳  张光全  廖忠  吴先麟  廖国庆
作者单位:成都市第六人民医院,四川,成都,610051;成都市第六人民医院,四川,成都,610051;成都市第六人民医院,四川,成都,610051;成都市第六人民医院,四川,成都,610051;成都市第六人民医院,四川,成都,610051
摘    要:目的:探讨胆囊切除术适应证患者的理想术式.方法:随机选取2006年3~6月腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)92例,小切口胆囊切除术(MC)103例.比较两组病人的手术时间、术中出血量、术后肠功能恢复、正常活动恢复、术后住院日、并发症等指标,方差分析比较两组是否有差异.结果:LC创伤程度小,病人恢复快,但并发症高;MC创伤较大,并发症少,适应证广.结论:两种术式各有优缺点,一种术式并不适合所有胆囊切除适应证的患者,选择术式应根据患者的具体情况决定.

关 键 词:胆囊切除术  腹腔镜  小切口  治疗结果
文章编号:1673-1557(2007)05-0325-02
修稿时间:2007-04-06

Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Minilaparotomy Cholecystectomy
HE Fang,ZHANG Guang-quan,LIAO Zhong,WU Xian-lin,LIAO Guo-qing. Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Minilaparotomy Cholecystectomy[J]. Journal of Modern Clinical Medicine, 2007, 33(5): 325-326
Authors:HE Fang  ZHANG Guang-quan  LIAO Zhong  WU Xian-lin  LIAO Guo-qing
Abstract:Objective:To explore the ideal method for cholecystectomy.Methods:A prospective study on the cases from 2006.3 to 2006.6 These cases were divided into two groups randomly.To compare the indicators such as surgical trauma,complications and postoperative recovery between laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) group(n=92)and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy(MC) group(n=103) statistically.Results:LC resulted in less surgical trauma(P<0.05),but more postoperative complications.MC was performed with a greater variety of indications.Conclusions:LC has more excellence than MC,but need select patients carefully.MC is certainly a safe operation method.An appropriate choice for the method of cholecystectomy should be made based on the characteristics of the patients.
Keywords:cholecystectomy  laparoscopy  minilaparotomy  treatment outcome
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《现代临床医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代临床医学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号