In vivo amyloid imaging with PET in frontotemporal dementia |
| |
Authors: | Henry Engler Shu Xia Wang Maria Lindau Irina Savitcheva Agneta Nordberg Lars Lannfelt Bengt Långström Lena Kilander |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Nuclear Medicine, Uruguay University Hospital of Clinics and Faculty of Science, Montevideo, Uruguay;(2) Department of Nuclear Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden;(3) Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden;(4) Uppsala Imanet, GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden;(5) Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences/Geriatrics, Uppsala University, Uppsala Science Park, 751 83 Uppsala, Sweden;(6) Weilun PET Centre, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, China;(7) Division of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden;(8) Department of Geriatric Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden;(9) Departments of Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden |
| |
Abstract: | Background N-methyl[11C]2-(4′methylaminophenyl)-6-hydroxy-benzothiazole (PIB) is a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer with amyloid binding properties which allows in vivo measurement of cerebral amyloid load in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a syndrome that can be clinically difficult to distinguish from AD, but in FTD amyloid deposition is not a characteristic pathological finding. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate PIB retention in FTD. Methods Ten patients with the diagnosis of FTD participated. The diagnosis was based on clinical and neuropsychological examination, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan, and PET with 18Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG). The PIB retention, measured in regions of interest, was normalised to a reference region (cerebellum). The results were compared with PIB retention data previously obtained from 17 AD patients with positive PIB retention and eight healthy controls (HC) with negative PIB retention. Statistical analysis was performed with a students t-test with significance level set to 0.00625 after Bonferroni correction. Results Eight FTD patients showed significantly lower PIB retention compared to AD in frontal (p < 0.0001), parietal (p < 0.0001), temporal (p = 0.0001), and occipital (p = 0.0003) cortices as well as in putamina (p < 0.0001). The PIB uptake in these FTD patients did not differ significantly from the HC in any region. However, two of the 10 FTD patients showed PIB retention similar to AD patients. Conclusion The majority of FTD patients displayed no PIB retention. Thus, PIB could potentially aid in differentiating between FTD and AD. Henry Engler and Alexander Frizell Santillo have contributed in equal part to the content of this article. |
| |
Keywords: | Frontotemporal dementia Amyloid PET PIB AD |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|