首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

区域卫生健康高质量发展评价方法研究
引用本文:侯静静,苏丽丽,黄晓光.区域卫生健康高质量发展评价方法研究[J].卫生软科学,2021(1):22-25.
作者姓名:侯静静  苏丽丽  黄晓光
作者单位:南京医科大学医政学院
基金项目:江苏省社会科学基金项目“江苏卫生健康事业高质量发展的评价指标体系构建研究”阶段性研究成果(19GLD011)。
摘    要:目的]探索适合地市级及以上卫生健康部门使用的区域卫生健康高质量发展评价方法.方法]分别采用综合评分法、逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)、秩和比法(RSR)、线性插值法对2018年江苏省13个地市的卫生健康高质量发展监测评价指标数据进行评价,采用Kendall协调系数W检验对评价结果一致性进行检验.在一致性良好的基础...

关 键 词:卫生健康  高质量发展  综合评价法  组合评价法

Study on evaluation methods of regional health high-quality development
HOU Jing-jing,SU Li-li,HUANG Xiao-guang.Study on evaluation methods of regional health high-quality development[J].Soft Science of Health,2021(1):22-25.
Authors:HOU Jing-jing  SU Li-li  HUANG Xiao-guang
Institution:(School of Health Policy and Management,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing Jiangsu 211166,China)
Abstract:Objective To explore regional health high-quality development evaluation methods which are suitable to the usage for prefecture(municipal)-level and above health departments.Methods Comprehensive scoring method,ideal solution(TOPSIS),rank-sum ratio(RSR)and linear interpolation method were respectively used to evaluate monitoring and evaluation index data of health high-quality development in 13 cities in Jiangsu province in 2018.Kendall coordination coefficient W test was used to test the consistency of the evaluation results.On the basis of good consistency,combination evaluation was conducted to evaluate four single synthetic evaluation results through average value method,weighted average combination evaluation method and hierarchical clustering analysis.Results The single evaluation results of each synthetic evaluation method were different,the front 3 rankings were all C1,C2 and C4.consistency test results showed that the evaluation results of 4 groups had good consistency.The order of combined evaluation value of mean value method and weighted combination evaluation method was identical.It was more appropriate that 13 cities were classified into 4 levels of high,higher,lower and low by hierarchical clustering analysis,there was statistically significant in category difference(P<0.01).Conclusions The four synthetic evaluation methods are all suitable to evaluation of health high-quality development in prefecture(municipal)-level or above health departments.Enhance the accuracy of evaluation results,it is necessary to combine multiple comprehensive evaluation methods in practical work.
Keywords:health  high-quality development  synthetic evaluation method  combination evaluation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号