首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

VVI型起搏器更换时心室电极直接参数的变化及临床意义
引用本文:姜衡,张从虬,李涛,尹宗宪,吴宗华,黄佐,黄高忠,殷仁富,陈金明,吴宗贵.VVI型起搏器更换时心室电极直接参数的变化及临床意义[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2002,16(4):256-258.
作者姓名:姜衡  张从虬  李涛  尹宗宪  吴宗华  黄佐  黄高忠  殷仁富  陈金明  吴宗贵
作者单位:1. 上海利群医院心血管内科,上海,200060
2. 第二军医大学长征医院心血管内科,上海,200003
摘    要:研究长期起搏器治疗后起搏阈值、电极阻抗的变化及电极使用的寿命。 32例病人 ,在起搏器置入术及更换术时 ,用起搏器分析仪直接测量心室电极参数。心室电极在体内埋置时间为 10 4 .2 2± 30 .10 (49~ 16 8)个月。置入时起搏阈值为 0 .72± 0 .33(0 .2~ 1.5 )V ,更换脉冲发生器时为 1.85± 0 .75 (1.0~ 3.5 )V ,P <0 .0 0 0 1。更换脉冲发生器时起搏阈值是置入时的 2 .5 7倍 ,增加幅度为 2 0 1.2 %± 16 2 .9% (10 %~ 70 0 % ) ,增加绝对值为 1.13± 0 .71(0 .1~2 .5 )V。置入时电极阻抗为 6 4 2 .83± 185 .39(333~ 980 )Ω ,更换脉冲发生器时为 70 2 .79± 73.0 0 (40 2~ 12 4 0 )Ω ,P >0 .0 5。更换起搏器后 ,对继续使用原心室电极的 2 8例随访 5 4 .91± 5 1.2 1(1~ 16 8)个月。 3例在更换术后 1~ 2 4个月分别出现起搏及感知障碍 ,再次手术时发现导管不全断裂、绝缘包鞘破损及微脱位。结论 :置入性右心室心内膜电极在使用 8年以上 ,大部分的直接参数在正常范围 ,可考虑继续使用 ,但早年生产的电极 ,更换术时参数即使正常 ,亦不排除电极可能短期内发生故障 ,须随访及定期复查。

关 键 词:起搏器  人工  起搏电极  起搏阈值  电极阻抗
文章编号:1007-2659(2002)04-0256-03
修稿时间:2001年6月25日

Clinical Significance of the Direct Lead Parameters Measurements on Implanted Ventricular Leads in the Patients With Pulse Generator Replacement.
JIANG Heng,ZHANG Cong qiu,LI Tao,et al..Clinical Significance of the Direct Lead Parameters Measurements on Implanted Ventricular Leads in the Patients With Pulse Generator Replacement.[J].Chinese Journal of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology,2002,16(4):256-258.
Authors:JIANG Heng  ZHANG Cong qiu  LI Tao  
Abstract:To investigate the change of pacing threshold and lead impedance and the service life of lead after long pacing treatment,32 patients were involved.Direct lead parameters of implanted ventricular leads that had been implanted for 104.22±30.10(49~168) months were detected using a pacing system analyzer during pulse generator replacement.Results:The chronic pacing thresholds of lead during pulse generator replacement were higher than initial pacing threshold (0.72±0.33 V vs 1.85±0.75 V, P <0.0001).The chronic pacing threshold was 2.57 times higher than that during initial implantation (with mean increased value of 1.13 ± 0.71 V).There were no significant changes in lead impedance (642.83±185.39 Ω vs 702.79±73.00 Ω, P >0.05) during pulse generator replacement.Follow up was taken for the 28 patients who continued to use the original ventricular leads after replacement of the pacemaker,with mean follow up for 54.91±51.21(1~168) months.Lead malfunction occurred in 3 patients in 1~24 months after replacement operation,including lead fracture and insulation defect,etc.Conclusion:Most direct parameters of implanted ventricular leads are in normal rangers after 8.6 years,and can be considered to continue performing pacing function.The problems of the lead occurred within short time is not likely to be avoided.Follow up and examination in certain period is need.For ceads made in early years their parameters may be normal during replacement.
Keywords:Pacemaker  artificial  Pacing lead  Pacing threshold  Lead impedance
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号