Socioeconomic inequalities in mental health in Australia: Explaining life shock exposure |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. School of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, 665-S Dyer Hall, Cincinnati, OH 45221–0389;2. College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL;3. Center for Social and Humanities Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia;1. School of Business, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia;2. Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia;3. BRAC Business School, BRAC University, 66 Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh;4. Department of Economics, American International University-Bangladesh, Kuratoli, Khilkhet, Dhaka, Bangladesh;5. Statistics Discipline; Science, Engineering and Technology School, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh;6. School of Advertising, Marketing & PR, Faculty of Business & Law, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia;8. Economics Discipline, Social Science School, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundRecent research suggests that there exists a strong link between life shocks and mental health. However, research on the distributional aspects of these shocks on mental health status is limited. In the health inequality literature no Australian studies have examined this relationship.ObjectiveThis study examines the distributional impact of life shocks (negative life events and financial hardships) on mental health inequality among different socioeconomic groups in a longitudinal setting in Australia.MethodsThis study analysed the data of 13,496 individuals from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, waves 12–17 (2012–2017). Using concentration index and Blinder-Oaxaca approaches, the study decomposed socioeconomic inequalities in mental health and changes in inequalities in mental health over the study period. The study used frailty indices to capture the severity of life shocks experienced by an individual.ResultsThe results suggest that exposure to just one life shock will result in a greater risk of mental disorder in the most disadvantaged socioeconomic groups. The results also indicate that 24.7%–40.5% of pro-rich socioeconomic mental health inequality are due to life shocks. Financial hardship shocks contributes to 21.6%–35.4% of inequality compared with 2.3%–5.4% inequality generated by negative life event shocks across waves.ConclusionsLower SES groups experience more life shocks than higher SES groups and in turn generate higher socioeconomic mental health inequality. Policies aimed at reducing socioeconomic inequality in mental health should account for these shocks when designing interventions. |
| |
Keywords: | Negative life events Financial hardships Socioeconomic inequality Mental health |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|